Skip to content

StackPath vs F5 BIG-IP

A detailed comparison to help you choose between StackPath and F5 BIG-IP.

Quick Verdict

1.0/5

StackPath

0 reviews

3.2/5

F5 BIG-IP

0 reviews

F5 BIG-IP is rated higher (3.2 vs 1.0). Defunct edge platform. StackPath closed all products and began liquidating assets in June 2024; its CDN line had already ceased in November 2023. Not purchasable. F5 BIG-IP provides hardware and software load balancing, application delivery, and DDoS mitigation for large-scale enterprise networks. Best for organizations requiring advanced traffic management and security.

StackPath

Defunct edge platform (closed 2024)

F5 BIG-IP

F5 BIG-IP

Enterprise load balancing and DDoS protection for mission-critical infrastructure

Overview
Rating1.0 (0 reviews)3.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modeldiscontinuedpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forNobody in 2026 — StackPath was dissolved in June 2024. For the same CDN + WAF + DDoS + edge compute combination, look at Cloudflare, Fastly, or Akamai.Large enterprises, financial services, healthcare, government and service providers consolidating high-traffic application delivery, WAF, SSL offload and DDoS mitigation on one audited platform
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
ddos protectionteam features
Visit StackPath →Visit F5 BIG-IP →

StackPath

Pros

  • + Historically bundled CDN, WAF, DDoS, and edge compute under one account
  • + Large final footprint (73 edge locations across 43 metro markets, company's own count)
  • + Edge compute with VMs and containers in the same PoPs as content delivery
  • + Backing from Juniper, Cox, and ABRY gave it enterprise credibility while it lasted

Cons

  • - Company defunct since June 2024 — all products closed, assets liquidated, support switched off
  • - CDN business sold to Akamai in 2023; customers stranded through three platform migrations in five years
  • - Conflicting PoP counts across its own marketing pages (45 / 50+ / 73)
  • - Any pricing or feature list found online is historical, not purchasable
View full StackPathreview →

F5 BIG-IP

Pros

  • + Consolidates load balancing, SSL/TLS offload, WAF, firewall/DoS mitigation, access/VPN and DNS on one policy engine
  • + Thirty-year reliability track record in banks, carriers and governments; mature HA clustering
  • + Full-proxy architecture with programmable iRules for traffic logic that generic load balancers cannot express
  • + Runs everywhere: hardware appliances, VIPRION/VELOS chassis, and Virtual Edition on VMware, KVM, Hyper-V and major clouds
  • + Dual-stack IPv6 support and ICSA-certified firewall with automatic and dynamic DoS signature handling

Cons

  • - Very expensive: throughput-tiered licenses, module add-ons and six-figure support contracts
  • - No public list pricing — real cost only emerges through partner sales processes
  • - Steep learning curve: its own OS (TMOS), its own DSL (iRules/TCL, AS3) and its own upgrade rituals
  • - Overkill for simple HTTP load balancing where cloud-native or open-source options cost a fraction
  • - Company is steering toward subscription and Distributed Cloud; multi-year renewal terms need pinning down
View full F5 BIG-IPreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.