SiteGround vs Krystal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between SiteGround and Krystal.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
SiteGround
0 reviews
4.0/5
Krystal
0 reviews
Krystal is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). SiteGround is a WordPress.org-recommended host with fast SSD storage, built-in CDN, free SSL, daily backups, and excellent support. One of the most popular managed WordPress options for SMBs. Krystal is a UK hosting company running entirely on renewable energy. Shared, VPS, and reseller hosting. UK-focused with strong ethics, GDPR compliance, and Reforestation pledge per signup.
SiteGround The web host recommended by WordPress.org | Krystal UK hosting powered by 100% renewable energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $3/mo✓ | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Small businesses, bloggers and non-technical WordPress owners who want the WordPress.org-recommended host with strong support and global datacenter choice, and accept the renewal premium | UK and EU businesses, charities, agencies and resellers who want transparent resource allocations, real UK support and verifiable green credentials, plus a UK-anchored cloud with S3-compatible storage |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 10 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | 99.99%✓ |
| Data-center count | 11✓ | 3 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €7.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €3.50 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | London, United KingdomAmsterdam, NetherlandsNew York, United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit SiteGround → | Visit Krystal → | |
SiteGround
Pros
- + 20+ years independent operation, WordPress.org-recommended, 3M+ domains — proven track record
- + Google Cloud infrastructure with 11 datacenter locations across US/EU/APAC and 170-point CDN
- + Support widely rated highly for shared hosting tiers; free expert migration included
- + 30 days of geo-distributed backup restore points, free SSL, daily backups on the lineup
- + Renewal rates are published openly in the KB rather than hidden
Cons
- - Renewals jump 4-5x from intro pricing (StartUp to $14.99-$17.99/mo standard)
- - StartUp plan limits: 1 site, 10 GB storage; daily backup coverage on StartUp is ambiguous
- - No root access or stack control — shared hosting economics at premium prices
- - Cores/RAM not published for shared plans; fair-use resource ceilings are opaque
- - Growing product surface (AI tools, email marketing) dilutes the hosting focus
Krystal
Pros
- + Shared plans publish real CPU and RAM allocations — rare at this price
- + Concrete SLA: 100% network availability with service credits, 99.99% cloud uptime target
- + Verified sustainability: B Corp, 1% for the Planet, ISO 27001, renewable-powered data centres
- + UK-based support with phone access and a 60-day money-back guarantee
- + Krystal Cloud adds per-second VMs, S3-compatible storage and T4/L4 GPUs in London, Amsterdam and New York
Cons
- - Priced well above budget shared hosts for comparable raw resources
- - UK-centred: shared hosting is London-only, no APAC regions
- - 24/7 emergency phone support only on the pricier plans
- - Inconsistent DDoS figures (4,000Gbps vs 2.0 Tbps) across its own pages
- - Unlimited storage and bandwidth are bounded by inode limits and fair use
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.