SiteGround vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between SiteGround and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
SiteGround
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
SiteGround is rated higher (3.8 vs 2.5). SiteGround is a WordPress.org-recommended host with fast SSD storage, built-in CDN, free SSL, daily backups, and excellent support. One of the most popular managed WordPress options for SMBs. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
SiteGround The web host recommended by WordPress.org | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $3/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | Small businesses, bloggers and non-technical WordPress owners who want the WordPress.org-recommended host with strong support and global datacenter choice, and accept the renewal premium | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | us datacenter |
| Visit SiteGround → | Visit HostMonster → | |
SiteGround
Pros
- + 20+ years independent operation, WordPress.org-recommended, 3M+ domains — proven track record
- + Google Cloud infrastructure with 11 datacenter locations across US/EU/APAC and 170-point CDN
- + Support widely rated highly for shared hosting tiers; free expert migration included
- + 30 days of geo-distributed backup restore points, free SSL, daily backups on the lineup
- + Renewal rates are published openly in the KB rather than hidden
Cons
- - Renewals jump 4-5x from intro pricing (StartUp to $14.99-$17.99/mo standard)
- - StartUp plan limits: 1 site, 10 GB storage; daily backup coverage on StartUp is ambiguous
- - No root access or stack control — shared hosting economics at premium prices
- - Cores/RAM not published for shared plans; fair-use resource ceilings are opaque
- - Growing product surface (AI tools, email marketing) dilutes the hosting focus
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.