Skip to content

WP Hosting by Porkbun vs HostMonster

A detailed comparison to help you choose between WP Hosting by Porkbun and HostMonster.

Quick Verdict

3.1/5

WP Hosting by Porkbun

0 reviews

2.5/5

HostMonster

0 reviews

WP Hosting by Porkbun is rated higher (3.1 vs 2.5). Porkbun now offers WordPress hosting bundled with their domain registration service. Affordable pricing and clean interface. Good for customers already using Porkbun for domain registration. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.

WP Hosting by Porkbun

WP Hosting by Porkbun

Budget WordPress hosting from domain registrar

HostMonster

HostMonster

Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently

Overview
Rating3.1 (0 reviews)✓2.5 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom $10/moFree tier available
Best forSmall brochure, portfolio, or link sites for customers already using Porkbun for domains who want one bill and one dashboardExisting HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
Provo, Utah, US
Tags
Tags
us datacenter
us datacenter
Visit WP Hosting by Porkbun →Visit HostMonster →

WP Hosting by Porkbun

Pros

  • + Cheap ongoing price ($10/mo Cloud for WordPress) with SSL, CDN and automatic backups included
  • + Secure Hosting Alliance certification — independently reviewed account isolation and abuse handling
  • + Honest comparison table and plain 'unmetered is not unlimited' shared-hosting terms
  • + Domain + hosting bundles with one dashboard and DNS-expert support staff
  • + 15-day free trial on most products, plus cPanel option for up to 50 sites

Cons

  • - No published uptime SLA, datacenter locations, or CPU/RAM allocations
  • - No documented backup retention or restore granularity
  • - Storage claims conflict between the plan marketing (up to 40G) and feature table (up to 20 GB)
  • - First-year discounts distort the headline price; renewals are 4x the promo rate
  • - Hosting is a side business — support depth is domain-centric, PHP version list looks dated
View full WP Hosting by Porkbunreview →

HostMonster

Pros

  • + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
  • + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
  • + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
  • + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus

Cons

  • - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
  • - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
  • - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
  • - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
  • - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
View full HostMonsterreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.