Site24x7 vs Checkly
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Site24x7 and Checkly.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Site24x7
0 reviews
4.1/5
Checkly
0 reviews
Checkly is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.6). Site24x7 by Zoho offers website, server, network, application, and cloud monitoring in one platform. 50+ monitoring types. Free 30-day trial, then affordable SMB pricing. Checkly enables monitoring as code using Playwright for E2E browser checks and HTTP API checks. Define checks alongside your code in TypeScript. Global check locations.
Site24x7 All-in-one monitoring from Zoho | Checkly Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | SMBs, agencies and MSPs that want broad, affordable monitoring in one console with regional data residency — especially teams already in the Zoho/ManageEngine ecosystem. | Engineering teams who want to define synthetic and API monitoring tests as code in their repository and run them from global locations |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessteam featuresmobile app | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Site24x7 → | Visit Checkly → | |
Site24x7
Pros
- + Unusually broad coverage — websites, servers, networks, APM, RUM, logs, Kubernetes and cloud costs in one console
- + Published unit and add-on pricing at every tier, with hourly billing for cloud and app instances
- + Seven data-center regions including EU, India and UAE — real data-residency choice for SMBs
- + Transparent 99.9% service SLA with explicitly listed exclusions
- + Natural fit and shared support relationship for existing Zoho/ManageEngine customers
Cons
- - APM depth is capped (trace sampling, short span retention, Enterprise-gated features) versus Datadog/New Relic
- - Many metered units (monitors, logs, synthetics, devices, containers) make bills hard to forecast as estates grow
- - Pricing pages contradict each other (pack table vs Lite/Professional/Enterprise structure)
- - Classic support resolution targets are slow — 30 business days for Severity 1
Checkly
Pros
- + True monitoring as code: TypeScript + Playwright checks versioned in your repo and deployed via CLI
- + Useful free Hobby tier and clear published plan pricing
- + 22 global check locations plus private locations for internal services on Team+
- + Full check types (HTTP, TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL/TLS, gRPC, traceroute, heartbeat) with rich alerting and status pages
- + Local test mode in CI catches broken checks before deploy; SOC 2 since 2022
Cons
- - Usage-based billing scales with frequency x locations x checks — overage at $4 per 1,000 runs adds up
- - Developer-only tool: no point-and-click path for non-technical teams
- - Synthetic monitoring only — not a replacement for APM, logs, or metrics platforms
- - No public uptime SLA for the platform itself; best features (1-second checks, parallel scheduling) gated to Enterprise
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.