Sirv vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sirv and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Sirv
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.4). Sirv delivers images and videos globally with automatic format conversion, responsive sizing, and interactive features. Built for e-commerce, media, and content-heavy sites needing fast load times. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
Sirv Image and video CDN with smart optimization built in | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | E-commerce and product-media teams that need zoomable, spinable, responsively delivered product imagery — especially on Shopify, WooCommerce, Magento or Drupal — without building their own image-processing stack. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Sirv → | Visit Gcore → | |
Sirv
Pros
- + On-the-fly image transformation from URL parameters — no build-time processing pipeline to maintain
- + 360° spin and deep zoom are first-class, not add-ons, which is what product photography actually needs
- + Generous free tier with S3 and FTP access, so originals stay portable
- + Soft limits instead of hard cutoffs — a traffic spike does not break the site
- + Long track record (since 2007) and a 99.999% SLA on Enterprise
Cons
- - 20 GB transfer on the $19 Business plan is thin for media-heavy stores; scale pricing needs a custom conversation
- - No published uptime commitment below Enterprise — failover and off-site replication are $999/month features
- - Video delivery is a secondary feature, not competitive with dedicated video platforms
- - Small vendor (roughly a dozen staff, unfunded) — weigh continuity risk and keep originals exported
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.