Skip to content

SingleStore vs Appwrite Cloud

A detailed comparison to help you choose between SingleStore and Appwrite Cloud.

Quick Verdict

3.8/5

SingleStore

0 reviews

3.9/5

Appwrite Cloud

0 reviews

Appwrite Cloud is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). SingleStore (formerly MemSQL) is a cloud-native database combining OLTP and OLAP in a single system. Handles real-time analytics and transactions without ETL. Used by financial services and gaming companies. Appwrite is an open source BaaS with database, authentication, storage, functions, and messaging. Self-hostable on Docker. Appwrite Cloud provides managed hosting.

SingleStore

SingleStore

Real-time analytics and transactions in one database

Appwrite Cloud

Appwrite Cloud

Open-source backend platform with built-in database, auth, and APIs

Overview
Rating3.8 (0 reviews)3.9 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams with genuinely mixed transactional and analytical workloads — fraud, risk, adtech, IoT, live gaming — that need sub-second freshness and want to retire a separate warehouse and sync pipeline.Developers and small teams who want a complete managed backend with a genuine self-hosting exit and refuse Firebase-style lock-in.
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapi access
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access
Visit SingleStore →Visit Appwrite Cloud →

SingleStore

Pros

  • + Transactions and analytics in one engine — no ETL pipeline between an operational database and a warehouse
  • + Published, itemised rate card: workspace sizes, credit burn, storage tiers and every multiplier are public
  • + Genuine free evaluation tier plus $500 of credits on Standard
  • + MySQL-compatible wire protocol shortens migration from MySQL-based stacks
  • + Documented compliance posture (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, CCPA, GDPR) and a BYOC option for data residency

Cons

  • - Stacking multipliers (Enterprise 1.5x, Multi-AZ 1.3x, region tier, scaling) make real bills hard to predict from headline prices
  • - Distributed-engine concepts (shard keys, distribution, reference tables) are overkill for simple CRUD applications
  • - Free Shared tier is explicitly non-production and self-support only
  • - Self-managed licensing and BYOC/Dedicated pricing require a sales conversation
View full SingleStorereview →

Appwrite Cloud

Pros

  • + BSD 3-Clause open source with full self-hosting on any Docker host
  • + Generous Pro resources: 2 TB bandwidth, 150 GB storage, 200K MAU at $25/month
  • + Complete backend stack: auth, databases, storage, functions, realtime, messaging
  • + Clear published overage rates and budget caps
  • + Six regions across NA, EU, and APAC

Cons

  • - No published uptime SLA on cloud plans
  • - Free tier pauses projects after a week of inactivity; two-project limit
  • - Per-project pricing multiplies cost for multi-project architectures
  • - Smaller integration ecosystem than Firebase or Supabase
View full Appwrite Cloudreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.