Skip to content

SigNoz vs Checkly

A detailed comparison to help you choose between SigNoz and Checkly.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

SigNoz

0 reviews

4.1/5

Checkly

0 reviews

Checkly is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). SigNoz is a full-stack open source observability platform — metrics, traces, and logs in one. Datadog alternative you can self-host. Uses ClickHouse for efficient storage. Checkly enables monitoring as code using Playwright for E2E browser checks and HTTP API checks. Define checks alongside your code in TypeScript. Global check locations.

SigNoz

SigNoz

Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces

Checkly

Checkly

Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forEngineering teams priced out of Datadog or New Relic that want OpenTelemetry-native logs, metrics and traces with computable usage-based costs and US/EU/India data residency.Engineering teams who want to define synthetic and API monitoring tests as code in their repository and run them from global locations
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United States, European Union, India (SigNoz Cloud regions)
—
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access
free tieropen sourceapi access
Visit SigNoz →Visit Checkly →

SigNoz

Pros

  • + Usage-based pricing with published per-unit rates ($0.30/GB logs and traces, $0.10/mn metric samples) and no per-user or per-host billing
  • + OpenTelemetry-native: no proprietary SDKs, so instrumentation does not lock you in
  • + Logs, metrics, traces, APM, exceptions and alerts correlated in one ClickHouse-backed product
  • + Self-hostable open-source community edition plus cloud regions in the US, EU and India with SOC2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
  • + Worked pricing examples and a bill calculator published — costs are computable before you commit

Cons

  • - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier (from $4,000/month)
  • - Self-hosted community edition makes storage, scaling, upgrades and backups your operational problem
  • - Usage bills move with retention choices and noisy telemetry; the $49 entry tier shows a struck-through $199 base price
  • - Narrower turnkey integration ecosystem than Datadog; RBAC is beta and audit logs/multi-tenancy are roadmap items
  • - Migration tooling and dedicated Slack support are gated at spends above $999/month
View full SigNozreview →

Checkly

Pros

  • + True monitoring as code: TypeScript + Playwright checks versioned in your repo and deployed via CLI
  • + Useful free Hobby tier and clear published plan pricing
  • + 22 global check locations plus private locations for internal services on Team+
  • + Full check types (HTTP, TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL/TLS, gRPC, traceroute, heartbeat) with rich alerting and status pages
  • + Local test mode in CI catches broken checks before deploy; SOC 2 since 2022

Cons

  • - Usage-based billing scales with frequency x locations x checks — overage at $4 per 1,000 runs adds up
  • - Developer-only tool: no point-and-click path for non-technical teams
  • - Synthetic monitoring only — not a replacement for APM, logs, or metrics platforms
  • - No public uptime SLA for the platform itself; best features (1-second checks, parallel scheduling) gated to Enterprise
View full Checklyreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.