Shuttle vs GitHub Container Registry
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Shuttle and GitHub Container Registry.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
4.1/5
GitHub Container Registry
0 reviews
GitHub Container Registry is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.4). Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust. GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io) stores Docker images alongside your GitHub repositories. Free for public images, included in GitHub plans for private. Integrates with GitHub Actions for CI/CD.
Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | GitHub Container Registry Container registry integrated with GitHub Actions | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. | Open-source maintainers distributing public images and GitHub-centric teams that want container images, code, CI, and permissions under one account. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 1 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 1 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS eu-west-2 (London) | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceus datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Shuttle → | Visit GitHub Container Registry → | |
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
GitHub Container Registry
Pros
- + Free storage and bandwidth for public images with anonymous pulls — strongest OSS distribution offer
- + Images live with the code: one account, one permission model, GITHUB_TOKEN in Actions
- + OCI-compliant (Docker V2 manifests, foreign layers), internal visibility and fine-grained package permissions
- + Container image storage currently free even for private images, with a one-month notice policy before changes
- + Spending limits available to cap overage; metered billing beyond plan quotas
Cons
- - Private plan quotas are small (500 MB on Free) and shared with GitHub Actions artifacts
- - Free private container storage is a policy, not a contract — changeable with one month's notice
- - No published SLA or regional placement for ghcr.io
- - Retention and promotion tooling lag purpose-built registries like Harbor or Artifactory
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.