Shock Hosting vs Equinix Colocation
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Shock Hosting and Equinix Colocation.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Shock Hosting
0 reviews
4.0/5
Equinix Colocation
0 reviews
Equinix Colocation is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.5). Shock Hosting provides dedicated server hosting with guaranteed uptime, flexible configurations, and 24/7 technical support. Built for businesses needing predictable performance without overprovisioning. Equinix is the world's largest colocation provider with 270+ International Business Exchange (IBX) data centers globally (investor materials cite ~280 across 77 metros in 36 countries). Direct cloud on-ramps to AWS, Azure, GCP, and private network peering.
Shock Hosting Reliable dedicated servers with transparent pricing and 24/7 support | Equinix Colocation World's largest colocation network — 270+ data centers | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $49.99/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | US, European and APAC deployments where a named carrier-neutral facility, IPMI access and responsive 24/7 support matter more than peak CPU benchmarks. | Enterprises whose infrastructure strategy depends on interconnection — financial services, networks, content platforms and multi-cloud architectures needing private on-ramps and a consistent global footprint of cabinets and cross-connects. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 16 GB | — |
| Storage | 2,000 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 10 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 100% | — |
| Data-center count | 18 | 270✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €12.50 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €3.12 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Jacksonville, Denver, Seattle, Coventry (UK), Paris, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Warsaw, Bucharest, Johannesburg, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterwindows available | eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterprivate networking |
| Visit Shock Hosting → | Visit Equinix Colocation → | |
Shock Hosting
Pros
- + Named, credible facilities (CoreSite CH1 Chicago, Equinix DA6 Dallas, H5 Denver, Telehouse NY) instead of vague datacenter claims
- + 18 locations across four continents with a published looking glass per datacenter
- + Transparent add-on pricing: Windows +$10/mo, extra IPv4 $2/mo, cPanel $20-40/mo, term discounts up to 25%
- + Root and IPMI on every dedicated server, network-level DDoS protection included
- + 24/7 human support with a consistent Trustpilot record (4.6 out of 5, 108 reviews)
Cons
- - Entry dedicated hardware is 2014-era (Xeon E3-1271 v3, DDR3) for $49.99/mo
- - Only four published dedicated configurations, all in Chicago; custom builds go through sales
- - Unmanaged by default; managed service is quote-only with no published scope
- - No published backup, snapshot or IPv6 terms for dedicated servers
- - Longest discounts require 24-36 month prepayment
Equinix Colocation
Pros
- + Unmatched interconnection density: 507,000+ interconnections, 2,000+ networks, direct cloud on-ramps
- + Published facility engineering: 99.999% stated uptime, N+1 power minimum, 24/7 on-site security
- + Global consistency — 270+ IBX locations across the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
- + Facility-level detail (seismic ratings, power architecture, certifications) is public, not deck-only
- + Mature operational services: remote hands, cross-connect provisioning, staging and shipping
- + 96% renewable energy across global operations, reported by a listed company (Nasdaq: EQIX)
Cons
- - No public pricing — sales-led, multi-year contracts; premium pricing in every metro
- - No self-service or hourly entry point; unsuitable for small deployments
- - Cross-connects, remote hands and expansion reservations add materially to the headline cost
- - Physical and contractual lock-in once cabling and cross-connects are established
- - Portfolio complexity (Fabric, Network Edge, Metal, xScale) blurs what is included in a colo contract
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.