ServerMania vs Constant (Choopa)
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ServerMania and Constant (Choopa).
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
ServerMania
0 reviews
3.6/5
Constant (Choopa)
0 reviews
Both ServerMania and Constant (Choopa) are equally rated at 3.6/5. ServerMania offers VPS, dedicated servers, and hybrid servers from Canada and the US. HIPAA-compliant infrastructure available. 24/7 support, custom configurations, and white-label reseller options. Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency.
ServerMania Canadian bare metal and VPS since 2002 | Constant (Choopa) Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | From $120/mo |
| Best for | Canadian and US businesses wanting configured dedicated hardware, Canadian or EU data residency, and human managed support on a predictable monthly bill | Teams wanting a single API and bill across global regions for mixed VM, bare metal, and GPU capacity, with an SLA strong enough for production |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 32 GB |
| Storage | — | 480 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 5 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 100% | 100% |
| Data-center count | 8 | 33✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €30.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €3.75 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 33 regions on six continents (list in specs) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedus datacenterwindows available | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit ServerMania → | Visit Constant (Choopa) → | |
ServerMania
Pros
- + In business since 2002 with its own network and 24/7 support
- + Eight locations including Canadian metros for data residency
- + Highly configurable hardware: RAID, storage, bandwidth, and software options
- + Bare metal, hybrid, hourly-billed cloud, and colocation under one roof
- + Candid published guidance on how hosting pricing works
Cons
- - No verifiable public plan-level price list; configurator-driven quotes
- - No free tier or self-serve cloud experience
- - No Asia-Pacific or South America datacenter
- - À-la-carte add-ons can inflate the final bill
- - Site copy is inconsistent (five vs eight facilities)
Constant (Choopa)
Pros
- + One platform across 33 regions: VMs, bare metal, GPU clusters, storage, managed databases, Kubernetes
- + Credit-backed 100% uptime SLA covering network and host node — stronger than most rivals on paper
- + Public, consistent pricing with hourly billing capped at 672 hours/month; mature API, CLI, Terraform support
- + Real bare metal range from 4-core E3 boxes to 128-core EPYC and 8-way H100/B200 GPU systems
- + BGP sessions with full tables, BYOIP, IPv6 in every region, free Anycast DNS
Cons
- - The brand in this listing is retired — Choopa was folded into Vultr in 2022 and no longer sells under its own name
- - Bare metal entry (~$120/mo) costs more than European specialists for comparable-era hardware
- - DDoS filtering beyond built-in mitigation is a $10/mo per-instance add-on; snapshots and backups also cost extra
- - Ticket-based big-platform support rather than the named-account service old Choopa customers knew
- - Billing edge cases: stopped instances can still bill on some lines, and percentage-based backups add up
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.