Sentry vs New Relic
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sentry and New Relic.
Quick Verdict
4.2/5
Sentry
0 reviews
4.0/5
New Relic
0 reviews
Sentry is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Sentry is the industry standard for application error monitoring. Captures exceptions with full stack traces, performance monitoring, session replay, and release tracking. Open source. New Relic is a full-stack observability platform with a unique pricing model: 100GB free data ingest/month. APM, infrastructure, browser monitoring, synthetics, and logs in one platform.
Sentry Application error tracking and performance monitoring | New Relic Full-stack observability — 100GB free per month | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Development teams who want application errors caught, grouped, and traced before users report them, with a usable free tier to start | Engineering teams that want APM, infrastructure, and logs in one platform with usage-based pricing and a genuinely free starting point |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features | free tierapi accessteam features |
| Visit Sentry → | Visit New Relic → | |
Sentry
Pros
- + Industry-standard error grouping and stack traces with code context
- + Free Developer plan at $0 including error monitoring and tracing
- + Framework SDKs make setup a one-afternoon job
- + EU data residency (Frankfurt) at no extra cost on all plans
- + Covers tracing, session replay, release health, cron and uptime monitors in one subscription
- + Self-hostable server code for teams that must run their own stack
Cons
- - Usage-based overage on errors, spans, and replays can spike bills unexpectedly
- - Real setup work needed to control noise (grouping, filters, sampling)
- - No public uptime SLA on self-serve plans
- - No APAC data region; some account metadata stays in the US even on EU orgs
- - Self-hosted deployment is operationally heavy and the license is not plain OSI open source
New Relic
Pros
- + Best free tier in observability: 100 GB ingest/month, one full platform user, unlimited basic users, no credit card
- + No per-host, per-agent, per-container, or per-function charges — cost tracks telemetry, not fleet size
- + Published unit pricing: $0.40/GB original data, $0.60/GB Data Plus, $49 core users, $10/$99 Standard full users
- + One platform for APM, infrastructure, logs, browser/mobile, synthetics, and alerting with NRQL across all of it
- + Published support response SLAs per edition (2 business days Standard, 2-hour critical Pro, 1-hour Enterprise)
Cons
- - Pro full platform users at $349/user (annual) or $418.80 monthly make seat costs the dominant expense
- - Free tier hard-stops ingest and platform access past 100 GB until the next month or an upgrade
- - Uptime commitments are contract-defined and vacated on Standard — no availability SLA below Pro
- - Cost forecasting across ingest tiers, user types, and Advanced Compute metering takes real effort
- - SaaS-only with US/EU data residency; NRQL dashboards and alerts carry switching costs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.