Sentry vs Checkly
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sentry and Checkly.
Quick Verdict
4.2/5
Sentry
0 reviews
4.1/5
Checkly
0 reviews
Sentry is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). Sentry is the industry standard for application error monitoring. Captures exceptions with full stack traces, performance monitoring, session replay, and release tracking. Open source. Checkly enables monitoring as code using Playwright for E2E browser checks and HTTP API checks. Define checks alongside your code in TypeScript. Global check locations.
Sentry Application error tracking and performance monitoring | Checkly Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 4.1 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Development teams who want application errors caught, grouped, and traced before users report them, with a usable free tier to start | Engineering teams who want to define synthetic and API monitoring tests as code in their repository and run them from global locations |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Sentry → | Visit Checkly → | |
Sentry
Pros
- + Industry-standard error grouping and stack traces with code context
- + Free Developer plan at $0 including error monitoring and tracing
- + Framework SDKs make setup a one-afternoon job
- + EU data residency (Frankfurt) at no extra cost on all plans
- + Covers tracing, session replay, release health, cron and uptime monitors in one subscription
- + Self-hostable server code for teams that must run their own stack
Cons
- - Usage-based overage on errors, spans, and replays can spike bills unexpectedly
- - Real setup work needed to control noise (grouping, filters, sampling)
- - No public uptime SLA on self-serve plans
- - No APAC data region; some account metadata stays in the US even on EU orgs
- - Self-hosted deployment is operationally heavy and the license is not plain OSI open source
Checkly
Pros
- + True monitoring as code: TypeScript + Playwright checks versioned in your repo and deployed via CLI
- + Useful free Hobby tier and clear published plan pricing
- + 22 global check locations plus private locations for internal services on Team+
- + Full check types (HTTP, TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL/TLS, gRPC, traceroute, heartbeat) with rich alerting and status pages
- + Local test mode in CI catches broken checks before deploy; SOC 2 since 2022
Cons
- - Usage-based billing scales with frequency x locations x checks — overage at $4 per 1,000 runs adds up
- - Developer-only tool: no point-and-click path for non-technical teams
- - Synthetic monitoring only — not a replacement for APM, logs, or metrics platforms
- - No public uptime SLA for the platform itself; best features (1-second checks, parallel scheduling) gated to Enterprise
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.