Sentry vs Checkly
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sentry and Checkly.
Quick Verdict
4.5/5
Sentry
243 reviews
5.0/5
Checkly
100 reviews
Checkly is rated higher (5.0 vs 4.5). Sentry is the industry standard for application error monitoring. Captures exceptions with full stack traces, performance monitoring, session replay, and release tracking. Open source. Checkly enables monitoring as code using Playwright for E2E browser checks and HTTP API checks. Define checks alongside your code in TypeScript. Global check locations.
Sentry Application error tracking and performance monitoring | Checkly Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (243 reviews) | 5.0 (100 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Development teams who want to catch application errors automatically before users report them | Engineering teams who want to define synthetic monitoring tests as code in their repository |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Sentry → | Visit Checkly → | |
Sentry
Pros
- + Industry-standard error tracking
- + Open source — self-hostable
- + Full stack traces with code context
Cons
- - Pricing scales with event volume
- - Can be noisy without proper tuning
Checkly
Pros
- + Monitoring as code in TypeScript
- + Playwright for browser monitoring
- + Works in CI/CD pipeline
Cons
- - Developer-focused — not for non-technical teams
- - Newer than Datadog synthetics
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.