Scaleway vs Azure Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Scaleway and Azure Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Scaleway
0 reviews
4.0/5
Azure Functions
0 reviews
Both Scaleway and Azure Functions are equally rated at 4.0/5. Scaleway provides bare-metal servers, VPS, and managed Kubernetes in European data centers. Designed for developers and small-to-medium businesses needing reliable cloud compute without vendor lock-in. Azure Functions is Microsoft's serverless platform. 1M free executions/month. Durable Functions for long-running workflows. Best integration with .NET, Microsoft 365, and Azure services.
Scaleway European cloud infrastructure with competitive pricing and transparent billing | Azure Functions Microsoft serverless functions for .NET teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $0.1/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | European companies needing data sovereignty and a full cloud ecosystem — VMs, Kubernetes, storage, GPUs — under one EU contract | Microsoft/.NET teams building event-driven processing, workflows (Durable Functions), and spiky APIs inside the Azure ecosystem |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 10 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €0.10 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.10 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | FranceNetherlandsPolandItaly | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionsnapshotsmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacentergdpr compliantterraform providerkubernetes supportapi access | free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Scaleway → | Visit Azure Functions → | |
Scaleway
Pros
- + Full EU footprint (Paris, Amsterdam, Warsaw, Milan) under French/EU law, outside the CLOUD Act
- + One vendor for instances, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, Object Storage, serverless and GPUs
- + Transparent per-hour pricing published to the cent, with free Kapsule control plane and unmetered instance egress
- + ISO 27001 and HDS certifications; documented SLAs with service credits per product
- + S3-compatible Object Storage with 75GB/month free and competitive per-GB rates
Cons
- - Compute costs notably more per GB RAM than Hetzner at the entry and mid tiers
- - Flexible IPv4 (about €2.90/month) and snapshot storage bill separately and quietly
- - Egress terms differ by product class and sources disagree; read the fine print before budgeting
- - SLA band varies by service (99.5% GPU to 99.99% PRO2) and credit claims take effort per user reports
- - Europe-only regions and ticket-based support without enterprise escalation
Azure Functions
Pros
- + Permanent free grant of 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-s per month
- + Trigger/binding integrations cover most Azure and third-party services declaratively
- + Durable Functions for stateful orchestration — the strongest workflow story among serverless platforms
- + Hosting plan ladder (Consumption, Flex, Premium, Dedicated, Container Apps) covers most cost/performance points
- + 99.95% SLA with service credits scaling up to 100% below 95% uptime
Cons
- - Cold starts on Consumption hurt latency-sensitive HTTP workloads
- - Per-instance limits (1.5 GB RAM, 1 core) cap what single functions can do
- - Azure surface area: storage account, monitoring, identity, and networking costs stack up
- - Bindings and Durable Functions abstractions lock integration logic to Azure
- - Premium costs real money whether or not traffic flows (EP1 ~$146/month US rates)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.