RxDB vs TigerData
A detailed comparison to help you choose between RxDB and TigerData.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
RxDB
0 reviews
4.2/5
TigerData
0 reviews
TigerData is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). RxDB is a real-time, offline-first NoSQL database for JavaScript applications. Works in the browser, Node.js, React Native, and Electron. Syncs with CouchDB, Firestore, and others. TigerData, from the creators of TimescaleDB, is a PostgreSQL cloud platform built for time-series and real-time analytics workloads at large scale, aimed at developers and enterprises.
RxDB Reactive database for JavaScript apps with real-time sync | TigerData PostgreSQL-native time-series database for metrics, events, and analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $30/mo |
| Best for | JavaScript teams building offline-first, UI-reactive apps (PWAs, Electron, React Native) that may later sync with their own backend | Teams building observability, IoT/telemetry, financial or real-time analytics platforms who want time-series performance inside standard PostgreSQL and can run the ops model of a managed Postgres service. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 13 AWS regions + 4 Azure regions across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and South America |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit RxDB → | Visit TigerData → | |
RxDB
Pros
- + Apache 2.0 core at $0 with replication, reactive queries and schema migration included
- + Pluggable storage engines keep one codebase across browser, Node, Electron and React Native
- + Mature project with a public changelog, 15,000+ commits and a documented replication protocol
- + Explicit conflict handling with revisions instead of silent last-write-wins
- + Tier pricing is published openly, including the exact free-tier limits
Cons
- - Paid tiers jump straight to $99/month billed annually with nothing in between
- - Free tier caps at 13 open collections; trial SQLite storage is evaluation-only at 500 documents
- - RxJS-shaped API carries a learning curve for teams new to observables
- - Effectively a one-primary-maintainer project with no support org behind the free tier
- - Sync backend is bring-your-own; there is no managed hosting or SLA on standard tiers
TigerData
Pros
- + Full SQL and the PostgreSQL extension ecosystem — hypertables, continuous aggregates and 90%+ compression without a new query language
- + Published consumption pricing (compute from $30/month, storage $0.177-0.212/GB-month) with hourly metering and no instance-size lock-in
- + 17 regions across AWS and Azure with EU, US and APAC residency selectable at creation
- + Reliability productized: multi-AZ HA, PITR up to 14 days, backup retention to 180 days, cross-region restore, public SLA and status page
- + Open-source TimescaleDB escape hatch — self-hosting stays viable, which keeps pricing honest
Cons
- - Hourly compute meter bills full hours and forgotten scale-ups at the higher config are expensive
- - Serious reliability and security features (multi-node HA, 14-day PITR, SOC 2, private endpoints) gated behind Scale or Enterprise
- - PostgreSQL and time-series concepts (chunks, compression/retention policies) assumed — not a zero-ops database for non-database teams
- - Effective storage price assumes 5x compression; actual ratios are workload-dependent
- - Aiven-partnered legacy MST product carries a different (99.99%) SLA — easy to confuse with Tiger Cloud
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.