Skip to content

RxDB vs CockroachDB

A detailed comparison to help you choose between RxDB and CockroachDB.

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

RxDB

0 reviews

4.2/5

CockroachDB

0 reviews

CockroachDB is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). RxDB is a real-time, offline-first NoSQL database for JavaScript applications. Works in the browser, Node.js, React Native, and Electron. Syncs with CouchDB, Firestore, and others. CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Managed plans: Basic (usage-based, free tier), Standard and Advanced (provisioned), plus BYOC and the new Cockroach Continuum editions.

RxDB

RxDB

Reactive database for JavaScript apps with real-time sync

CockroachDB

CockroachDB

Distributed SQL database that survives failures

Overview
Rating3.9 (0 reviews)4.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forJavaScript teams building offline-first, UI-reactive apps (PWAs, Electron, React Native) that may later sync with their own backendApplications where the database must survive region loss without losing transactions — payments, ledgers, identity, multi-region SaaS, global gaming backends — and teams ready for distributed-SQL trade-offs
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—2 vCPU
RAM——
Storage——
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime—99.99%
Data-center count——
€/vCPU/mo—€0.00
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
AWS, GCP and Azure regions across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific (multi-region clusters)
Tags
Tags
free tieropen source
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
Visit RxDB →Visit CockroachDB →

RxDB

Pros

  • + Apache 2.0 core at $0 with replication, reactive queries and schema migration included
  • + Pluggable storage engines keep one codebase across browser, Node, Electron and React Native
  • + Mature project with a public changelog, 15,000+ commits and a documented replication protocol
  • + Explicit conflict handling with revisions instead of silent last-write-wins
  • + Tier pricing is published openly, including the exact free-tier limits

Cons

  • - Paid tiers jump straight to $99/month billed annually with nothing in between
  • - Free tier caps at 13 open collections; trial SQLite storage is evaluation-only at 500 documents
  • - RxJS-shaped API carries a learning curve for teams new to observables
  • - Effectively a one-primary-maintainer project with no support org behind the free tier
  • - Sync backend is bring-your-own; there is no managed hosting or SLA on standard tiers
View full RxDBreview →

CockroachDB

Pros

  • + True multi-region survivability with serializable transactions and Postgres wire compatibility
  • + Generous free tier: Basic at $0/month with 50M RUs and 10 GiB free monthly, $400 trial credits, no card required
  • + Contractual SLAs: 99.99% availability, up to 99.999% multi-region on Advanced; P1 response targets published
  • + Transparent per-component cost documentation and a public pricing calculator
  • + Enterprise compliance path (CMEK, PCI DSS, HIPAA) and AWS/GCP/Azure coverage

Cons

  • - Production costs climb fast: storage billed at 4.5x durability multiplier, plus backups, CDC and egress
  • - September 2026 plan restructure (Cockroach Continuum) splits new and existing customers onto different rate cards
  • - Distributed-SQL learning curve: RU model, planner differences from vanilla Postgres, cross-region latency
  • - Overkill for single-region applications — managed Postgres is far cheaper for the same job
  • - Proprietary managed plane; open-core self-hosting shifts the operational burden back to you
View full CockroachDBreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.