rsync.net vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
rsync.net
0 reviews
4.0/5
Wasabi
0 reviews
Both rsync.net and Wasabi are equally rated at 4.0/5. rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. S3-compatible cloud storage priced at a flat $7.99 per TB per month with no fees for downloads or API requests, widely used for backups.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $12/mo | From $7.99/mo✓ |
| Best for | Sysadmins who want SSH-native off-site backup storage with immutable snapshots, honest per-GB pricing, and humans on the support line. | Backup, offsite copy, and media-archive storage where data is written once, kept for months or years, and read occasionally — especially at 500 GB and above |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Fremont, CA; Denver, CO; Zurich, Switzerland; Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong | 16 regions: US (N. Virginia x2, Texas, Oregon, California), Canada (Toronto), Netherlands (Amsterdam), Germany (Frankfurt), UK x2, France (Paris), Italy (Milan), Japan x2 (Tokyo, Osaka), Singapore, Australia (Sydney) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Wasabi → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + Plain SSH-reachable UNIX filesystem: works with rsync, Borg, Restic, rclone, git-annex
- + Immutable ZFS snapshots on every standard account — strong ransomware protection
- + No egress charges, no contracts, and per-GB pricing that falls with volume
- + Own infrastructure in four locations (Fremont, Denver, Zurich, Hong Kong) with free account migration
- + Unlimited email and phone support from real engineers at every account size
Cons
- - No web UI — account management is email-based and the product is command-line only
- - 800 GB minimum on standard accounts; no free tier
- - Per-terabyte cost is higher than B2-class object storage for cold archives
- - No contractual uptime SLA published (resiliency claims are statistics, not commitments)
- - Bring your own backup tool, scheduling, and monitoring
Wasabi
Pros
- + Flat $7.99/TB/month with zero egress and API request charges — bills are predictable to the dollar
- + S3-compatible API with broad backup-software support (Veeam, rclone, Synology, MSP360 and others)
- + 16 regions with per-bucket region pinning, covering US, EU, and APAC data-residency needs
- + Credit-backed 99.9% uptime SLA with a published error-rate measurement methodology
- + No cold-tier latency: everything is hot storage, so restores are immediate
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage duration — early deletion or overwriting incurs Timed Deleted Storage charges
- - 1 TB minimum monthly charge makes small datasets uneconomical
- - Fair-use policy implicitly caps monthly egress near stored volume — not a CDN origin play
- - Single storage tier only; no cheap cold class for rarely-retrieved archives
- - Basic support only on Pay-as-You-Go; Premium support is tied to Reserved Capacity contracts
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.