rsync.net vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Wasabi.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ | 4.2 (469 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €8/mo | From €7/mo✓ |
| Best for | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider | Backup storage and archiving where data is written often but read infrequently |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 8 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesNetherlandsGermanyJapanAustralia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Wasabi → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Wasabi
Pros
- + No egress fees, no API call fees
- + EU and US datacenter options
- + Very simple flat pricing
Cons
- - Minimum 90-day storage commitment — early deletion charged
- - No free tier
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.