rsync.net vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Hetzner Storage Box.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (47 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €8/mo | From €3/mo✓ |
| Best for | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.