rsync.net vs Acronis Cyber Protect
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and Acronis Cyber Protect.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
rsync.net
0 reviews
3.6/5
Acronis Cyber Protect
0 reviews
rsync.net is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup with AI-based malware and ransomware protection. Physical, virtual, and cloud workload backup with 50+ cloud storage destinations.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | Acronis Cyber Protect Backup with built-in anti-malware protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $12/mo✓ | From $85/mo |
| Best for | Sysadmins who want SSH-native off-site backup storage with immutable snapshots, honest per-GB pricing, and humans on the support line. | IT teams and MSPs running mixed physical, virtual, and Microsoft 365 estates who want backup and endpoint protection consolidated into one console, with control over where backup data is stored. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Fremont, CA; Denver, CO; Zurich, Switzerland; Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong | Acronis-operated sites plus Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure regions (26 data centers per 2021 briefing), incl. Singapore, Japan, Australia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | mobile appteam features |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit Acronis Cyber Protect → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + Plain SSH-reachable UNIX filesystem: works with rsync, Borg, Restic, rclone, git-annex
- + Immutable ZFS snapshots on every standard account — strong ransomware protection
- + No egress charges, no contracts, and per-GB pricing that falls with volume
- + Own infrastructure in four locations (Fremont, Denver, Zurich, Hong Kong) with free account migration
- + Unlimited email and phone support from real engineers at every account size
Cons
- - No web UI — account management is email-based and the product is command-line only
- - 800 GB minimum on standard accounts; no free tier
- - Per-terabyte cost is higher than B2-class object storage for cold archives
- - No contractual uptime SLA published (resiliency claims are statistics, not commitments)
- - Bring your own backup tool, scheduling, and monitoring
Acronis Cyber Protect
Pros
- + Backup and endpoint security (anti-malware, patch management, EDR on Advanced) unified in one agent and console
- + Wide storage flexibility: 26+ Acronis/Google/Azure data centers plus S3, Wasabi, Swift, NFS and on-prem S3-compatible destinations
- + Image-based backups with incremental chains, deduplication, and pre-restore malware scanning fit ransomware recovery planning
- + Coverage across Windows/Linux servers, VMs, workstations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NAS, and mobile
- + Two licensing models (per-workload and per-GB) let matching your workload shape cut costs significantly
Cons
- - Licensing matrix is genuinely confusing; server protection at roughly $595–$925/server/year dwarfs workstation pricing
- - The combined agent can be heavy on CPU and memory on constrained endpoints
- - Backup-only buyers pay for a security platform they may not want; console complexity reflects five jobs in one product
- - Vendor scale figures and destination counts are marketing claims with limited independent verification
- - Support and SLA terms differ between direct business products and the service-provider platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.