Restic vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Restic and Hetzner Storage Box.
Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (40 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (47 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €3/mo |
| Best for | Developers and sysadmins wanting a flexible, encrypted backup tool that can target any storage backend | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Restic → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
Restic
Pros
- + Backs up to any storage backend — S3, B2, GCS, SFTP
- + Strong AES-256 encryption
- + No server — single binary
Cons
- - Command-line only
- - Repository management can be complex
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.