Radware vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Radware and AWS WAF.
Radware Behavioral DDoS mitigation with machine learning |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.7 (217 reviews) | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From €2000/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Enterprises with complex attack scenarios needing machine learning-based behavioral DDoS detection | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionteam features | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Radware → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Radware
Pros
- + ML-based behavioral detection
- + Hybrid on-prem + cloud mitigation
- + 24/7 SOC service
Cons
- - Very expensive enterprise product
- - Complex deployment
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.