Radware vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Radware and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.1/5
Radware
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.1). Radware delivers DDoS mitigation, WAF, and bot management for enterprises. Protects web applications and infrastructure from volumetric attacks, Layer 7 exploits, and malicious automation at scale. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
Radware Enterprise DDoS protection and application security platform | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.1 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprises, financial services, government and service providers with an existing security function that need hybrid or on-premises DDoS enforcement and can fund an enterprise security contract. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionteam features | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Radware → | Visit Gcore → | |
Radware
Pros
- + Deploy on-premises, always-on cloud, on-demand or hybrid under one policy model
- + Emergency Response Team managed service included with the cloud DDoS tiers
- + 30 Tbps of scrubbing capacity across 25 fully connected centers with Anycast routing
- + DefensePro X keeps traffic inspection and TLS keys on premises while using cloud-scale attack intelligence
- + Long public track record — NASDAQ-listed since 1999, 12,500+ customers claimed across 80+ countries
Cons
- - No public pricing; published list prices put serious tiers in the six-figure annual class
- - Assumes an in-house security team for tuning, thresholds and policy management
- - Product sprawl — WAF, bot management and Web DDoS Protection are separate line items
- - Poor fit for startups and mid-market buyers who need self-service onboarding
- - Scrubbing center locations and contractual SLA numbers are not published
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.