Radware vs Cloudflare WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Radware and Cloudflare WAF.
Quick Verdict
3.1/5
Radware
0 reviews
4.2/5
Cloudflare WAF
0 reviews
Cloudflare WAF is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.1). Radware delivers DDoS mitigation, WAF, and bot management for enterprises. Protects web applications and infrastructure from volumetric attacks, Layer 7 exploits, and malicious automation at scale. Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.
Radware Enterprise DDoS protection and application security platform | Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.1 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprises, financial services, government and service providers with an existing security function that need hybrid or on-premises DDoS enforcement and can fund an enterprise security contract. | Any website behind Cloudflare that wants a maintained application firewall and DDoS absorption as a baseline — from hobby projects on the free tier to compliance-bound businesses on Business or Enterprise. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionteam features | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Radware → | Visit Cloudflare WAF → | |
Radware
Pros
- + Deploy on-premises, always-on cloud, on-demand or hybrid under one policy model
- + Emergency Response Team managed service included with the cloud DDoS tiers
- + 30 Tbps of scrubbing capacity across 25 fully connected centers with Anycast routing
- + DefensePro X keeps traffic inspection and TLS keys on premises while using cloud-scale attack intelligence
- + Long public track record — NASDAQ-listed since 1999, 12,500+ customers claimed across 80+ countries
Cons
- - No public pricing; published list prices put serious tiers in the six-figure annual class
- - Assumes an in-house security team for tuning, thresholds and policy management
- - Product sprawl — WAF, bot management and Web DDoS Protection are separate line items
- - Poor fit for startups and mid-market buyers who need self-service onboarding
- - Scrubbing center locations and contractual SLA numbers are not published
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + WAF engine and managed ruleset included on every plan, including Free
- + Unmetered DDoS absorption at the edge on all tiers
- + Central rules maintenance — no appliances, agents or rule deployments to manage
- + Attack-score and bot-management layers available as needs grow
- + Flat plan pricing; no per-request or per-rule metering
Cons
- - Advanced rate limiting, attack-score rules and full log export are plan-gated
- - Managed rules can block legitimate traffic; tuning requires a logging-first workflow
- - Free plan limits request body inspection to 1 MB
- - Only applies to proxied records — DNS-only traffic is not filtered
- - A compensating control, not a substitute for fixing application vulnerabilities
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.