Quay.io vs HashiCorp Nomad
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Quay.io and HashiCorp Nomad.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Quay.io
0 reviews
3.8/5
HashiCorp Nomad
0 reviews
HashiCorp Nomad is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.7). Red Hat's hosted container image registry: unlimited free public repos, per-private-repository pricing from $15/month, automatic Clair v4 CVE scanning, robot accounts, teams, and exportable audit logs. HashiCorp Nomad is a flexible workload orchestrator for containers, VMs, and standalone applications. Simpler than Kubernetes. Integrates with Consul and Vault. Enterprise features available.
Quay.io Hosted container registry from Red Hat: free public repos, CVE scanning, per-private-repo pricing | HashiCorp Nomad Simple, flexible workload orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium: free Community Edition under BUSL 1.1 (source-available, not open source), quote-based Enterprise |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Open-source projects needing free public image hosting, and Red Hat-centric enterprises wanting managed registries with SSO, robot accounts and audit logging | Platform teams running mixed workloads — containers, batch, bare binaries, and VMs — who want one lightweight scheduler across on-prem and multi-cloud, especially existing Consul/Vault shops that value operational simplicity. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssoapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Quay.io → | Visit HashiCorp Nomad → | |
Quay.io
Pros
- + Unlimited free public repositories with automatic CVE scanning on every push
- + Public, predictable per-repository pricing from $15/month for 5 private repos
- + Robot accounts, team permissions, SSO and exportable audit logs aimed at compliance teams
- + Decade-plus production track record (launched 2013) with a supported upgrade path to self-managed Red Hat Quay
- + Full API, image rollback, zero-downtime garbage collection and Git build triggers
Cons
- - Per-repository billing punishes micro-repo layouts; large tiers get expensive fast
- - No published uptime SLA for the hosted service
- - Clair does not cover every language ecosystem, and remediation is entirely on the customer
- - Free tier fair-use caps (100 GB storage, 1 TB egress) are enforceable quotas
- - Overlapping product lineup (Quay.io vs Red Hat Quay vs OpenShift Platform Plus) complicates buying
HashiCorp Nomad
Pros
- + One binary orchestrates containers, VMs, executables, Java, and batch jobs with HCL job specs
- + Community Edition is free and includes multi-region federation, ACLs, UI, and autoscaling
- + Native Consul and Vault integration; no etcd/ZooKeeper-style dependency to operate
- + Low operational overhead versus Kubernetes — a small team can run it competently
- + Documented IBM support-cycle policy: named LTS branches with base support into 2028 and extended support into 2032
- + Scales to thousands of nodes across multiple datacenters and regions with bin-packing, preemption, and resiliency features
Cons
- - BUSL 1.1 since August 2023 — source-available, not open source; competitor-hosting clause needs legal review
- - IBM ownership (closed February 2025) means roadmap and governance are no longer independent; no strong community fork exists
- - Far smaller ecosystem, community, and hiring pool than Kubernetes
- - Enterprise pricing is quote-only; compliance features (namespaces, Sentinel, audit logs) sit behind the paid tier
- - Ingress, cert management, and network policy require Consul and your own plumbing
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.