Quay.io vs LinuxServer.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Quay.io and LinuxServer.io.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Quay.io
0 reviews
4.2/5
LinuxServer.io
0 reviews
LinuxServer.io is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.7). Red Hat's hosted container image registry: unlimited free public repos, per-private-repository pricing from $15/month, automatic Clair v4 CVE scanning, robot accounts, teams, and exportable audit logs. LinuxServer.io maintains a library of curated, consistently built Docker container images — 293 repositories on Docker Hub as of October 2026
Quay.io Hosted container registry from Red Hat: free public repos, CVE scanning, per-private-repo pricing | LinuxServer.io Curated Docker images for self-hosted apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Open-source projects needing free public image hosting, and Red Hat-centric enterprises wanting managed registries with SSO, robot accounts and audit logging | Self-hosters, homelab builders and small teams who want a consistent, well-documented container fleet and are prepared to run the infrastructure themselves. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssoapi access | free tieropen source |
| Visit Quay.io → | Visit LinuxServer.io → | |
Quay.io
Pros
- + Unlimited free public repositories with automatic CVE scanning on every push
- + Public, predictable per-repository pricing from $15/month for 5 private repos
- + Robot accounts, team permissions, SSO and exportable audit logs aimed at compliance teams
- + Decade-plus production track record (launched 2013) with a supported upgrade path to self-managed Red Hat Quay
- + Full API, image rollback, zero-downtime garbage collection and Git build triggers
Cons
- - Per-repository billing punishes micro-repo layouts; large tiers get expensive fast
- - No published uptime SLA for the hosted service
- - Clair does not cover every language ecosystem, and remediation is entirely on the customer
- - Free tier fair-use caps (100 GB storage, 1 TB egress) are enforceable quotas
- - Overlapping product lineup (Quay.io vs Red Hat Quay vs OpenShift Platform Plus) complicates buying
LinuxServer.io
Pros
- + Entirely free and open source — 293 maintained Docker Hub repositories with no premium tier
- + Standardized conventions (shared base images, s6-overlay v3, uniform config layout) across the fleet
- + Automatic rebuilds when upstream apps or dependencies update, with version-linked image tags
- + Documentation for every image at docs.linuxserver.io plus general container guides
- + Long verifiable track record since 2015 with hundreds of millions of pulls
Cons
- - Not a hosting service — you run, patch, back up and secure the infrastructure yourself
- - Community-only support on a "reasonable endeavours" basis: no SLA, no paid escalation
- - Breaking changes between base image versions and deliberately no `latest` tag on base images
- - No vendor accountability or compliance paperwork behind the supply chain
- - Images only — no orchestration, backup or managed-update layer
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.