Skip to content

Prometheus vs Grafana Cloud

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Prometheus and Grafana Cloud.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

Prometheus

0 reviews

3.9/5

Grafana Cloud

0 reviews

Prometheus is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). Prometheus is the leading open source metrics monitoring system. Pull-based metrics collection, PromQL query language, and Alertmanager. Kubernetes-native. Self-hosted with integrations for 200+ services. Grafana Cloud provides managed Grafana, Prometheus, Loki (logs), Tempo (traces), and k6 (load testing). Free tier includes 10,000 metrics series. Open source self-hosting also available.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Open source metrics and alerting system

Grafana Cloud

Grafana Cloud

Open source observability platform — cloud and self-hosted

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)✓3.9 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreefreemium
Starting priceFreeFree tier available
Best forDevOps and platform teams that want the Kubernetes-native open-source metrics standard they fully control, and accept running the storage and HA story themselves.Teams wanting a managed, self-hostable observability stack with a genuinely useful free tier and metrics, logs, and traces under one pane
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceself hostable
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features
Visit Prometheus →Visit Grafana Cloud →

Prometheus

Pros

  • + Free and open source under Apache 2.0 with independent CNCF governance — no per-node or per-metric licensing
  • + The industry-standard metrics stack: PromQL, multidimensional labels, and exporters for most software you already run
  • + Kubernetes and Consul service discovery keep target configuration sane at container scale
  • + Simple core: single autonomous nodes with local TSDB and a documented operational model
  • + CNCF graduated since 2018 with a decade of production history and a very active contributor community
  • + Honest documentation — storage constraints and the security model are stated plainly, including what the product deliberately does not do

Cons

  • - No built-in long-term storage or global HA — Thanos, Cortex, or Grafana Mimir are separate operational projects
  • - High-cardinality labels can blow up RAM and disk with no guardrails in the product
  • - No built-in authentication or encryption; endpoints must be kept behind a perimeter by design
  • - Multi-tenancy and access control are absent from the core
  • - Community support only for the open-source download — SLAs come with paid managed offerings
  • - PromQL and histogram handling have a genuine learning curve for teams new to the model
View full Prometheusreview →

Grafana Cloud

Pros

  • + Open source core (AGPLv3) across Grafana/Mimir/Loki/Tempo/Pyroscope — a real self-host exit
  • + Permanent free tier: 10k metric series, 50 GB logs/traces/profiles, 500 k6 VUh, no credit card
  • + Public Pro pricing ($19/mo platform fee, from $6.50/1k series) with automatic volume discounts
  • + 42 stack regions on AWS, Azure, and GCP including a Federal Cloud option

Cons

  • - Usage-based billing punishes metric cardinality and log verbosity — bills can spike on app-side mistakes
  • - PromQL/LogQL and label design have a real learning curve
  • - SLA is 99.5% (paid plans only) — below hyperscaler commitments
  • - Some enterprise RBAC/audit/reporting features require a quote-based Enterprise plan
View full Grafana Cloudreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.