Porter vs Dokku
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Porter and Dokku.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Porter
0 reviews
4.2/5
Dokku
0 reviews
Dokku is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Provision a Kubernetes cluster in your own AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud account and get Heroku-like deployments with PR preview environments, autoscaling, and GitHub-based CI/CD. Dokku is an open source PaaS you deploy on any VPS. Heroku-compatible buildpacks, Git push deployments, Let's Encrypt SSL, and Docker support. Run your own Heroku on a $5 Hetzner server.
Porter Kubernetes deployments for teams without DevOps | Dokku Self-hosted mini Heroku on your own VPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | free |
| Starting price | From $1.9/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Growing engineering teams, including AI startups, who need Kubernetes scalability and GPU workloads in their own cloud account without dedicated DevOps staff | Developers comfortable with Linux who want Heroku-style deployments at VPS pricing on infrastructure they own and control |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionteam featureskubernetes supportapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Porter → | Visit Dokku → | |
Porter
Pros
- + Heroku-style deploys on Kubernetes in your own cloud account — data and billing stay with AWS/Azure/GCP
- + Transparent metering ($6/GB RAM, $13/vCPU monthly, per-minute prorating) with a published pricing calculator
- + Clean exit: the cluster remains and is yours to operate if you stop paying
- + Removes real operational toil — CI/CD, preview environments, autoscaling, CVE patches, cluster upgrades
- + GPU instances and one-click SOC 2/HIPAA fit AI and compliance-sensitive startups
Cons
- - Requires a cloud account and ~30 minutes of provisioning; more setup than Render or Railway
- - Two invoices (Porter plus cloud provider); idle environments still meter
- - Deep incidents are Kubernetes-shaped to debug
- - Pivot-prone startup history and premium support gated behind the Enterprise track
Dokku
Pros
- + Free MIT-licensed software — you only pay for the underlying server
- + Heroku-compatible buildpacks and git push workflow make migration from Heroku straightforward
- + Mature project (since 2013) with 353 releases and a large plugin ecosystem
- + Full control over data, costs and where your apps physically run
- + Optional Dokku Pro is a one-time $849 lifetime license, not a subscription
Cons
- - Self-managed: OS updates, security, backups and monitoring are your responsibility
- - Single-host design — no built-in failover, autoscaling or multi-host scheduling
- - Support is community-only (GitHub issues, Slack) unless you buy Dokku Pro
- - Plugin quality and upgrade compatibility vary across the community ecosystem
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.