Portainer vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Portainer and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
Portainer
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Portainer is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.4). Portainer is an open source container management UI for Docker, Kubernetes, and Docker Swarm. Deploy containers, manage stacks, and monitor resources through a browser. Free Community Edition available. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Portainer GUI for managing Docker and Kubernetes | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams and homelabbers managing Docker and Kubernetes estates who want a GUI with real RBAC and governance, plus industrial operators running offline edge fleets | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Portainer → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Portainer
Pros
- + Business Edition free forever for 3 nodes with the complete feature set; Community Edition fully open source
- + Published per-node pricing — rare transparency with no contact-sales wall before Starter and Scale
- + One license covers Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, and Podman environments together
- + Strong governance: RBAC, SSO/LDAP, audit logs, GitOps, fleet policies with drift remediation
- + Edge capability is real: offline-first, air-gap capable, industrial fleets at scale
Cons
- - Self-hosted only — you own the servers and the underlying platform problems
- - Starter's 16 vCPU-per-node cap and community-only support push upgrades sooner than expected
- - Cost scales with both node count and node size; Enterprise is quote-only
- - A UI over Kubernetes does not remove deep Kubernetes debugging when things break
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.