Skip to content

PocketBase vs PlanetScale

A detailed comparison to help you choose between PocketBase and PlanetScale.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

PocketBase

0 reviews

4.2/5

PlanetScale

0 reviews

PlanetScale is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). PocketBase is an open source backend consisting of a single executable file with embedded SQLite database, realtime subscriptions, auth, file storage, and an admin dashboard. Managed Postgres and MySQL (Vitess) databases with branching and zero-downtime schema changes. No free tier; Postgres starts at $5/month, Vitess at $39/month.

PocketBase

PocketBase

Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs

PlanetScale

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with database branching

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfree and open source (MIT); self-hosted, infrastructure costs onlypaid
Starting priceFree tier available✓From $5/mo
Best forSolo developers and small teams who want a self-hosted backend with auth, database, files and realtime — without running multiple services or paying a platform feeTeams running MySQL (or Postgres) at scale who want Vitess-grade sharding and safe, reviewable schema migrations without operating the infrastructure themselves
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—0 vCPU
RAM—1 GB
Storage—10 GB
Bandwidth—0 TB/mo
SLA uptime—99.99%
Data-center count—19
€/GB RAM/mo—€5.00
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
12 AWS + 7 GCP regions incl. US, EU, APAC (Tokyo, Mumbai, Singapore, Sydney, Seoul) and South America (Sao Paulo)
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceself hostable
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access
Visit PocketBase →Visit PlanetScale →

PocketBase

Pros

  • + Complete backend (SQLite, REST API, auth, files, SSE realtime, admin UI) in one MIT-licensed binary
  • + Zero software cost and no vendor lock-in: MIT licence explicitly permits commercial reuse and self-hosting
  • + Fast local storage and simple deployment — Docker, any VPS, or embedded as a Go framework in your own binary
  • + Extensible without Go via JS hooks and migrations; S3-compatible file storage and built-in backup tooling
  • + Excellent documentation and a 61.5k-star community; auth covers password, OAuth2, OTP and MFA out of the box

Cons

  • - Pre-1.0 with no backward-compatibility guarantee — v0.23 broke the core Go API and hooks
  • - Single-node SQLite: no clustering, replication or managed failover; HA and backups are your job
  • - Predominantly one maintainer, community support only — no SLA or support contract
  • - No official managed hosting (third parties fill that gap), no job queue or cron built in
View full PocketBasereview →

PlanetScale

Pros

  • + Built by the Vitess maintainers — branching, deploy requests and online schema migrations are first-class
  • + Three engines (Postgres, Vitess, sharded Neki) plus Metal local-NVMe tiers for I/O-heavy workloads
  • + Unusually transparent pricing: published SKU tables and a SQL-queryable per-region pricing endpoint
  • + Three-zone HA with automatic failover and a 99.99% SLA on HA configurations
  • + 19 AWS/GCP regions plus a bring-your-own-cloud Managed option for data-residency needs

Cons

  • - No free tier or trial — the Hobby plan was retired in April 2024
  • - Metered extras (storage, egress, backups, branch hours) make the real bill higher than sticker prices
  • - Vitess constraints: no foreign keys in the classic model and a real sharding learning curve
  • - Single-node $5 entry is not highly available; production HA starts at $15/month before usage
View full PlanetScalereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.