Skip to content

PlanetScale vs PocketBase

A detailed comparison to help you choose between PlanetScale and PocketBase.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

PlanetScale

0 reviews

4.0/5

PocketBase

0 reviews

PlanetScale is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Managed Postgres and MySQL (Vitess) databases with branching and zero-downtime schema changes. No free tier; Postgres starts at $5/month, Vitess at $39/month. PocketBase is an open source backend consisting of a single executable file with embedded SQLite database, realtime subscriptions, auth, file storage, and an admin dashboard.

PlanetScale

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with database branching

PocketBase

PocketBase

Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)✓4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidfree and open source (MIT); self-hosted, infrastructure costs only
Starting priceFrom $5/moFree tier available✓
Best forTeams running MySQL (or Postgres) at scale who want Vitess-grade sharding and safe, reviewable schema migrations without operating the infrastructure themselvesSolo developers and small teams who want a self-hosted backend with auth, database, files and realtime — without running multiple services or paying a platform fee
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU—
RAM1 GB—
Storage10 GB—
Bandwidth0 TB/mo—
SLA uptime99.99%—
Data-center count19—
€/GB RAM/mo€5.00—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
12 AWS + 7 GCP regions incl. US, EU, APAC (Tokyo, Mumbai, Singapore, Sydney, Seoul) and South America (Sao Paulo)
—
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access
free tieropen sourceself hostable
Visit PlanetScale →Visit PocketBase →

PlanetScale

Pros

  • + Built by the Vitess maintainers — branching, deploy requests and online schema migrations are first-class
  • + Three engines (Postgres, Vitess, sharded Neki) plus Metal local-NVMe tiers for I/O-heavy workloads
  • + Unusually transparent pricing: published SKU tables and a SQL-queryable per-region pricing endpoint
  • + Three-zone HA with automatic failover and a 99.99% SLA on HA configurations
  • + 19 AWS/GCP regions plus a bring-your-own-cloud Managed option for data-residency needs

Cons

  • - No free tier or trial — the Hobby plan was retired in April 2024
  • - Metered extras (storage, egress, backups, branch hours) make the real bill higher than sticker prices
  • - Vitess constraints: no foreign keys in the classic model and a real sharding learning curve
  • - Single-node $5 entry is not highly available; production HA starts at $15/month before usage
View full PlanetScalereview →

PocketBase

Pros

  • + Complete backend (SQLite, REST API, auth, files, SSE realtime, admin UI) in one MIT-licensed binary
  • + Zero software cost and no vendor lock-in: MIT licence explicitly permits commercial reuse and self-hosting
  • + Fast local storage and simple deployment — Docker, any VPS, or embedded as a Go framework in your own binary
  • + Extensible without Go via JS hooks and migrations; S3-compatible file storage and built-in backup tooling
  • + Excellent documentation and a 61.5k-star community; auth covers password, OAuth2, OTP and MFA out of the box

Cons

  • - Pre-1.0 with no backward-compatibility guarantee — v0.23 broke the core Go API and hooks
  • - Single-node SQLite: no clustering, replication or managed failover; HA and backups are your job
  • - Predominantly one maintainer, community support only — no SLA or support contract
  • - No official managed hosting (third parties fill that gap), no job queue or cron built in
View full PocketBasereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.