Skip to content

PingPerfect vs Nitrado

A detailed comparison to help you choose between PingPerfect and Nitrado.

Quick Verdict

3.6/5

PingPerfect

0 reviews

3.7/5

Nitrado

0 reviews

Nitrado is rated higher (3.7 vs 3.6). UK-based game server host since 2013 with ~250 games, a custom Gamepanel, DDoS mitigation and nightly backups included, and 20 locations across six continents. No published latency guarantee; free 48-hour trial and 48-hour money-back instead. Nitrado (marbis GmbH, Karlsruhe) is a leading global game server host with a current catalog of 70 games

PingPerfect

PingPerfect

Game server hosting since 2013 with 20 locations and free 48-hour trial

Nitrado

Nitrado

Game server hosting for 100+ games globally

Overview
Rating3.6 (0 reviews)3.7 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom $9.99/moFrom $1.69/mo✓
Best forEuropean and North American co-op gaming communities wanting managed servers with backups, game switching, and fast human supportGaming communities and families wanting instant, managed game servers with short rental terms, mobile management, game switching, and access to console-crossplay and studio-partnered titles.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM6 GB—
Storage100 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count20—
€/GB RAM/mo€1.67—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
20 locations incl. UK, NL, FR, DE, 9 US cities, CA, BR, CL, ZA, SG, AU
—
Tags
Tags
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter
mobile appeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit PingPerfect →Visit Nitrado →

PingPerfect

Pros

  • + Game switching without cancelling: one subscription covers any of ~250 supported games
  • + Every plan includes nightly offsite backups, DDoS mitigation, ~100 GB NVMe and free web hosting
  • + 48-hour free trial plus 48-hour money-back lets you measure real ping before committing
  • + 24/7 support with an advertised sub-ten-minute average response and 1,500+ KB articles
  • + Clear per-game pricing on popular titles (Valheim from $9.99, Rust from $14.21, Minecraft from $17.62)

Cons

  • - No published uptime SLA or latency guarantee — only the 48-hour refund window
  • - Footprint is US-heavy: 9 US locations but just Singapore and Sydney for all of APAC
  • - Spec disclosure is partial: no per-plan core counts, no bandwidth allowance published
  • - Some titles only reveal pricing at checkout; small company means service depends on a ~10-person team
View full PingPerfectreview →

Nitrado

Pros

  • + Instant setup with a mature control panel, mobile apps, and parental controls
  • + Game switching on the same server allocation without losing data
  • + In-house game-specific DDoS mitigation (SteelShield) and three-layered protection
  • + Own hardware in Tier 3 data centers across five continents with enterprise SSD storage
  • + Studio partnerships and exclusive console/crossplay titles (ARK:SA, Dune: Awakening)
  • + Low entry pricing per rental period with VAT-inclusive, multi-currency billing

Cons

  • - No per-plan CPU/RAM disclosure — slot counts without hardware specs
  • - Shared resources on entry tiers; stutters under heavy mods or large worlds
  • - No published consumer uptime SLA; remedies are credit-based
  • - Support response varies by game and season, especially around game launches
  • - PE-owned roll-up (MCProHosting, APEX) reduces price competition in the Minecraft segment
  • - Catalog is 70 games, not the 100+ our listing claimed
View full Nitradoreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.