phoenixNAP vs Latitude.sh
A detailed comparison to help you choose between phoenixNAP and Latitude.sh.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
phoenixNAP
0 reviews
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
phoenixNAP is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). phoenixNAP offers on-demand bare metal servers, colocation, and IaaS in Phoenix, Ashburn, Atlanta, Amsterdam, and Singapore. HIPAA-compliant infrastructure available. From $100/month. Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support.
phoenixNAP Bare metal cloud in North America and Europe | Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $38.81/mo✓ | From $69/mo |
| Best for | Teams that need dedicated-server performance with cloud-style hourly provisioning — CI/CD fleets, game servers, database nodes, and Kubernetes on bare metal in the US, EU, or Singapore | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | 12 vCPU✓ |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB✓ |
| Storage | 480 GB | 800 GB✓ |
| Bandwidth | 15 TB/mo | 20 TB/mo✓ |
| SLA uptime | 100%✓ | 99.5% |
| Data-center count | 6 | 23✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €9.70 | €5.75✓ |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €2.43 | €2.16✓ |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Phoenix, Ashburn, Chicago, Seattle, Amsterdam, Singapore | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit phoenixNAP → | Visit Latitude.sh → | |
phoenixNAP
Pros
- + Dedicated physical hardware provisioned in about a minute via API, CLI, or Terraform
- + Transparent pricing: hourly billing, published per-instance rates, $0.01/GB bandwidth overage
- + 15 TB bandwidth and 20 Gbps DDoS protection included; 20/50 Gbps bonded network ports
- + Network depth: BYO IPv4/IPv6, BGP local and global, Anycast, Netris VPC-like networking
- + Concrete SLAs — 100% power/network target with service credits, defined hardware replacement terms
Cons
- - Only six BMC deployment locations despite a larger company network footprint
- - Entry s0.d1.small runs a Haswell-era Xeon E3-1240v3; modern instances cost several times more
- - No snapshots, no included backups, no resizing — scaling means redeploying
- - Public IPv4 allocations billed separately and reserved instances keep billing after deletion
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.