AWS WAF vs Sucuri
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Sucuri.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
5.0/5
Sucuri
261 reviews
Sucuri is rated higher (5.0 vs 4.9). AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield. Sucuri provides website firewall (cloud proxy WAF), DDoS protection, CDN, and website malware cleanup services. Popular for WordPress sites and small businesses needing website security.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Sucuri Website firewall and malware cleanup service | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews) | 5.0 (261 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €20/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | WordPress site owners who want a WAF plus professional malware cleanup if they get hacked |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Sucuri → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Sucuri
Pros
- + Includes malware cleanup service
- + WordPress-focused with good plugin integration
- + DDoS protection included
Cons
- - Slower CDN than Cloudflare
- - Not free — from $20/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.