AWS WAF vs Sucuri
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Sucuri.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
AWS WAF
0 reviews
3.7/5
Sucuri
0 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield. GoDaddy-owned website security platform (founded 2010): cloud WAF, Anycast CDN, DDoS mitigation, and unlimited human malware cleanups. Firewall-only plans from $9.99/mo; security platform plans from $229/yr. Popular with WordPress sites and small businesses.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Sucuri Website firewall and malware cleanup service | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $5/mo✓ | From $9.99/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need a managed, OWASP-focused WAF tightly integrated with CloudFront or ALB, with rules deployed as code | WordPress and small-business site owners who want a cloud firewall plus guaranteed professional malware cleanup from one vendor, and value recovery speed enough to pay for a faster SLA tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Sucuri → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Edge-level blocking on CloudFront stops bad traffic before it reaches the origin
- + Transparent metered pricing with AWS's own worked cost examples published
- + AWS managed rule groups (OWASP CRS, SQLi, IP reputation) cost $1 each per month
- + Written SLA: 99.95% monthly uptime per region with defined service credits
- + Full API/CloudFormation coverage and deep CloudWatch and logging integration
Cons
- - Useless outside AWS — only protects CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway and AppSync resources
- - Web ACL Capacity Unit overages and Bot Control per-request fees can multiply the bill
- - Rule authoring is verbose JSON; serious use needs AWS and infrastructure-as-code skills
- - No free tier and no bundled DDoS cost protection without the separate Shield Advanced subscription
Sucuri
Pros
- + Unlimited manual malware cleanups by real analysts on every platform plan
- + WAF, DDoS mitigation (layers 3/4/7), and CDN in one proxy — one DNS change to activate
- + Clear, published plan economics: SLA times and scan frequencies per tier
- + Virtual patching covers unpatched CMS installs while you update
- + 24/7/365 ticket support and a 30-day money-back guarantee
Cons
- - Best feature (human cleanup) engages after you are already breached
- - Response SLAs are tier-gated: 30-hour estimate on the entry plan, and it is not an uptime SLA
- - CDN performance is a convenience layer, not a match for dedicated CDN networks
- - No free tier; firewall-only plans exclude the cleanup service
- - GoDaddy ownership adds portfolio-strategy questions for a trust-critical purchase
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.