AWS WAF vs Sucuri
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Sucuri.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Sucuri Website firewall and malware cleanup service | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews) | 5.0 (261 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €20/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | WordPress site owners who want a WAF plus professional malware cleanup if they get hacked |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Sucuri → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Sucuri
Pros
- + Includes malware cleanup service
- + WordPress-focused with good plugin integration
- + DDoS protection included
Cons
- - Slower CDN than Cloudflare
- - Not free — from $20/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.