AWS WAF vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
4.8/5
Gcore
275 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.8). AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield. Gcore is a European CDN and cloud provider with 150+ PoPs including strong coverage in Russia, CIS, Middle East, and Africa. CDN, cloud compute, streaming, and DDoS protection.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (275 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Starting price | From €5/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Gcore → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.