AWS WAF vs Cloudflare

A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Cloudflare.

AWS WAF

AWS WAF

Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB

Cloudflare

Cloudflare

Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage

Overview
Rating4.9 (8 reviews)4.4 (122 reviews)
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
Starting priceFrom €5/moFree tier available
Best forAWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setupTeams building web applications requiring global distribution, DDoS protection, and cost-efficient object storage without egress fees.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count300
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — 300+ cities
Tags
Tags
api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider
Visit AWS WAF →Visit Cloudflare →

AWS WAF

Pros

  • + Deep AWS integration
  • + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
  • + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway

Cons

  • - Complex rule management
  • - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
View full AWS WAFreview →

Cloudflare

Pros

  • + Remove egress fees with R2 object storage pricing model
  • + Deploy content globally with automatic edge caching
  • + Mitigate DDoS attacks with Anycast network
  • + Integrate security and performance in one platform

Cons

  • - R2 has limited regional availability compared to AWS S3
  • - Steeper learning curve for complex configuration options
  • - Egress costs still apply for some traffic patterns outside R2
View full Cloudflarereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.