Path.net vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and AWS WAF.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Path.net
0 reviews
4.0/5
AWS WAF
0 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.4). 12 Tbps of network capacity across 22 internet hubs AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | Free tier available | From $5/mo |
| Best for | Game hosts, VoIP providers, web hosts and network operators facing volumetric L3/L4 attacks who need BGP scrubbing without buying hardware. | AWS-invested applications that need a managed, OWASP-focused WAF tightly integrated with CloudFront or ALB, with rules deployed as code |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + Pure-play BGP scrubbing with 12 Tbps published capacity over 22 hubs
- + Stateful patented firewall plus XDP/eBPF line-rate filtering, layers 3-7
- + No under-attack fees; same-day setup with no hardware
- + Tier 3 24x7 support and an engineering-led sales process
- + Customer base of hosts, VoIP and infrastructure operators signals real mitigation experience
Cons
- - No public price list and no published SLA we could find
- - Small company (11-50 employees) — probe support depth and references
- - Narrow scope: scrubbing and BGP, not WAF/CDN/application security
- - Region map unpublished; EU and APAC node locations unverified
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Edge-level blocking on CloudFront stops bad traffic before it reaches the origin
- + Transparent metered pricing with AWS's own worked cost examples published
- + AWS managed rule groups (OWASP CRS, SQLi, IP reputation) cost $1 each per month
- + Written SLA: 99.95% monthly uptime per region with defined service credits
- + Full API/CloudFormation coverage and deep CloudWatch and logging integration
Cons
- - Useless outside AWS — only protects CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway and AppSync resources
- - Web ACL Capacity Unit overages and Bot Control per-request fees can multiply the bill
- - Rule authoring is verbose JSON; serious use needs AWS and infrastructure-as-code skills
- - No free tier and no bundled DDoS cost protection without the separate Shield Advanced subscription
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.