Path.net vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and AWS WAF.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 3.6). Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation. AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From €300/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.