Path.net vs ModSecurity
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and ModSecurity.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | ModSecurity Open source WAF for Nginx and Apache | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.0 (250 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From €300/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Security engineers who want a free self-hosted WAF they fully control on their Nginx or Apache servers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit ModSecurity → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
ModSecurity
Pros
- + Free and open source
- + OWASP Core Rule Set included
- + Runs on any Nginx or Apache server
Cons
- - Complex to tune — many false positives by default
- - Requires WAF expertise
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.