Path.net vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Path.net
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.4). 12 Tbps of network capacity across 22 internet hubs Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Game hosts, VoIP providers, web hosts and network operators facing volumetric L3/L4 attacks who need BGP scrubbing without buying hardware. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Gcore → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + Pure-play BGP scrubbing with 12 Tbps published capacity over 22 hubs
- + Stateful patented firewall plus XDP/eBPF line-rate filtering, layers 3-7
- + No under-attack fees; same-day setup with no hardware
- + Tier 3 24x7 support and an engineering-led sales process
- + Customer base of hosts, VoIP and infrastructure operators signals real mitigation experience
Cons
- - No public price list and no published SLA we could find
- - Small company (11-50 employees) — probe support depth and references
- - Narrow scope: scrubbing and BGP, not WAF/CDN/application security
- - Region map unpublished; EU and APAC node locations unverified
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.