Path.net vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
4.8/5
Gcore
275 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (4.8 vs 3.6). Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation. Gcore is a European CDN and cloud provider with 150+ PoPs including strong coverage in Russia, CIS, Middle East, and Africa. CDN, cloud compute, streaming, and DDoS protection.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews) | 4.8 (275 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From €300/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Gcore → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.