Path.net vs Cloudflare WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Cloudflare WAF.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
3.5/5
Cloudflare WAF
249 reviews
Path.net is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.5). Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation. Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews)✓ | 3.5 (249 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From €300/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Every website — Cloudflare WAF is the standard baseline for web application firewall protection |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Cloudflare WAF → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + Free WAF rules on all plans
- + DDoS mitigation up to 142Tbps
- + 300+ PoP global network absorbs attacks
Cons
- - Advanced WAF rules require Pro+ plan
- - Some legitimate traffic can be blocked
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.