Skip to content

Path.net vs Cloudflare WAF

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Cloudflare WAF.

Quick Verdict

3.4/5

Path.net

0 reviews

4.2/5

Cloudflare WAF

0 reviews

Cloudflare WAF is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.4). 12 Tbps of network capacity across 22 internet hubs Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.

Path.net

Path.net

BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing

Cloudflare WAF

Cloudflare WAF

Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites

Overview
Rating3.4 (0 reviews)4.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forGame hosts, VoIP providers, web hosts and network operators facing volumetric L3/L4 attacks who need BGP scrubbing without buying hardware.Any website behind Cloudflare that wants a maintained application firewall and DDoS absorption as a baseline — from hobby projects on the free tier to compliance-bound businesses on Business or Enterprise.
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Tags
Tags
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Path.net →Visit Cloudflare WAF →

Path.net

Pros

  • + Pure-play BGP scrubbing with 12 Tbps published capacity over 22 hubs
  • + Stateful patented firewall plus XDP/eBPF line-rate filtering, layers 3-7
  • + No under-attack fees; same-day setup with no hardware
  • + Tier 3 24x7 support and an engineering-led sales process
  • + Customer base of hosts, VoIP and infrastructure operators signals real mitigation experience

Cons

  • - No public price list and no published SLA we could find
  • - Small company (11-50 employees) — probe support depth and references
  • - Narrow scope: scrubbing and BGP, not WAF/CDN/application security
  • - Region map unpublished; EU and APAC node locations unverified
View full Path.netreview →

Cloudflare WAF

Pros

  • + WAF engine and managed ruleset included on every plan, including Free
  • + Unmetered DDoS absorption at the edge on all tiers
  • + Central rules maintenance — no appliances, agents or rule deployments to manage
  • + Attack-score and bot-management layers available as needs grow
  • + Flat plan pricing; no per-request or per-rule metering

Cons

  • - Advanced rate limiting, attack-score rules and full log export are plan-gated
  • - Managed rules can block legitimate traffic; tuning requires a logging-first workflow
  • - Free plan limits request body inspection to 1 MB
  • - Only applies to proxied records — DNS-only traffic is not filtered
  • - A compensating control, not a substitute for fixing application vulnerabilities
View full Cloudflare WAFreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.