Path.net vs Cloudflare

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Cloudflare.

Path.net

Path.net

BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing

Cloudflare

Cloudflare

Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage

Overview
Rating3.6 (278 reviews)4.4 (122 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidfreemium
Starting priceFrom €300/moFree tier available
Best forGaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigationTeams building web applications requiring global distribution, DDoS protection, and cost-efficient object storage without egress fees.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count300
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — 300+ cities
Tags
Tags
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider
Visit Path.net →Visit Cloudflare →

Path.net

Pros

  • + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
  • + BGP announcement support
  • + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well

Cons

  • - Enterprise pricing
  • - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
View full Path.netreview →

Cloudflare

Pros

  • + Remove egress fees with R2 object storage pricing model
  • + Deploy content globally with automatic edge caching
  • + Mitigate DDoS attacks with Anycast network
  • + Integrate security and performance in one platform

Cons

  • - R2 has limited regional availability compared to AWS S3
  • - Steeper learning curve for complex configuration options
  • - Egress costs still apply for some traffic patterns outside R2
View full Cloudflarereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.