Path.net vs Akamai
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Path.net and Akamai.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
3.5/5
Akamai
375 reviews
Path.net is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.5). Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation. Akamai invented the CDN industry in 1998. 340,000+ servers in 130+ countries. Enterprise CDN, edge security, and media delivery at massive scale. Acquired Linode for cloud compute.
Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing |  Akamai The original CDN — 340,000 servers globally | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (278 reviews)✓ | 3.5 (375 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €300/mo✓ | From €500/mo |
| Best for | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation | Global media companies and enterprises needing the largest and most battle-tested CDN infrastructure |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Path.net → | Visit Akamai → | |
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Akamai
Pros
- + 340,000 servers — unmatched global scale
- + Enterprise security and media delivery
- + Includes Linode cloud compute
Cons
- - Enterprise-only pricing — complex procurement
- - Not for individuals or SMBs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.