OVHcloud Object Storage vs Storj
A detailed comparison to help you choose between OVHcloud Object Storage and Storj.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
OVHcloud Object Storage
0 reviews
3.5/5
Storj
0 reviews
OVHcloud Object Storage is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.5). 13 regions in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, UK, Poland), Canada and Asia-Pacific; no US region Decentralized S3-compatible object storage. Data is client-side encrypted, erasure-coded, and distributed across tens of thousands of storage locations in 100+ countries. Since July 2026: $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress (Standard), 30-day free trial with 25GB, then a $5 monthly minimum.
OVHcloud Object Storage S3-compatible object storage from €0.014/GB (Standard), Cold Archive from €0.00128/GB | Storj Decentralized S3-compatible cloud storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $0.014/mo✓ | From $5/mo |
| Best for | EU-resident, read-heavy object storage — media libraries, backup repositories and CMS assets — where free egress keeps bills predictable. | Teams storing large, write-mostly objects — backups, archives, media, datasets — who want S3-compatible storage at flat per-TB pricing with optional U.S. data residency, and accept variable performance. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | s3 compatibleeu datacentergdpr compliantapi access | free tiers3 compatibleopen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit OVHcloud Object Storage → | Visit Storj → | |
OVHcloud Object Storage
Pros
- + Free egress and free API requests on Standard storage — rare among S3 providers
- + Volume-tiered pricing from €0.014/GB/month, billed per GiB-hour
- + Cold Archive at about €0.00128/GB/month for French-resident archives
- + 13 regions across Europe, Canada and Asia-Pacific with clear per-region endpoints
- + Five storage classes with documented class-to-region availability
Cons
- - No US region — North America is served from Canada
- - Cold Archive is Paris-only with 180-day minimum retention and €0.005/GB restores
- - Most regions are 1-AZ; multi-region redundancy must be designed by the user
- - S3 compatibility is not full AWS parity; console is dense
Storj
Pros
- + $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress on Standard — far below hyperscaler egress economics
- + 11 nines durability target via erasure coding across independent nodes; no single point of failure
- + S3-compatible gateway plus Object Mount (two licenses free with every account)
- + Advanced tier pins data to U.S. SOC 2 Type 2 compliant data centers for residency needs
- + Open source, client-side encryption by default, and a 30-day trial with no credit card
Cons
- - No permanent free tier — 30-day trial only, then a $5 monthly minimum fee that is not a credit
- - Pricing changed twice in a year; the 2026 migration's opt-out deletes your data within 45 days
- - 50KB object minimum and 30-day minimum retention punish small-object and churn-heavy workloads
- - Performance varies with node geography versus single-region centralized storage
- - New ownership (Inveniam, October 2025) and STORJ token economics add strategy risk
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.