OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift
A detailed comparison to help you choose between OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
0 reviews
3.6/5
Red Hat OpenShift
0 reviews
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.6). managed K8s clusters in all OVHcloud Public Cloud regions (Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific) Red Hat OpenShift is a managed Kubernetes distribution that adds developer tools, CI/CD pipelines, and enterprise security on top of Kubernetes. Built for teams managing containerized applications at scale.
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes EU managed Kubernetes from OVH at low cost | Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise Kubernetes platform with built-in DevOps and security | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | EU-focused teams that want managed Kubernetes economics without control-plane fees and are comfortable driving clusters through Terraform and kubectl. | Regulated enterprises and large platform teams that need a certified, supported Kubernetes platform with compliance tooling, hybrid deployment freedom, and vendor accountability — not teams optimizing for cost |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | On-prem/bare metal plus managed services on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionhourly billingeu datacentergdpr compliantapi access | managed optionteam featuressso |
| Visit OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes → | Visit Red Hat OpenShift → | |
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
Pros
- + Permanently free managed control plane on the Free plan (up to 100 nodes)
- + Standard plan adds dedicated multi-AZ control plane for $0.099/hour per cluster
- + Official Terraform/Pulumi support, autoscaling, OIDC, vRack private networking
- + EU data residency with regions in France, Germany, UK and Poland
- + $200 Public Cloud trial credit covers roughly a month of real worker nodes
Cons
- - Free plan SLA is 99.5% with no service credits; Standard 99.99% promised only after beta
- - Control panel is dense and less polished than GKE or DigitalOcean
- - Ticket-based support on standard tiers; no multi-cluster management in-product
- - etcd quota (400 MiB free / 8 GiB standard) limits CRD-heavy operator usage
Red Hat OpenShift
Pros
- + Complete, supported enterprise Kubernetes: CI/CD, registry, mesh, policy, Operator catalog, lifecycle management in one platform
- + Runs everywhere — bare metal, VMware, all major clouds — with managed options (Dedicated, ROSA, ARO, IBM Cloud) and a 99.95% SLA
- + Real accountability: 24x7 Red Hat support, certified components, and compliance evidence for regulated industries
- + Full IPv6 single/dual-stack networking and documented NVIDIA GPU support including bare-metal GPU deployments
Cons
- - The most expensive way to run Kubernetes per core, with quote-driven self-managed pricing and no public list table
- - Heavy abstraction layer and real lock-in (Routes, BuildConfigs, ImageStreams, SCCs) versus upstream Kubernetes
- - Portfolio sprawl: four self-managed editions and four managed services are hard to navigate and easy to over-buy
- - Platform administration skills still required; restricted security defaults reject workloads that run fine elsewhere
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.