OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes vs DigitalOcean Kubernetes
A detailed comparison to help you choose between OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes and DigitalOcean Kubernetes.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
0 reviews
3.8/5
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
0 reviews
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). managed K8s clusters in all OVHcloud Public Cloud regions (Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific) DigitalOcean Kubernetes (DOKS) is one of the most affordable managed Kubernetes services. No cluster management fee — pay only for worker nodes. Integrates with DO load balancers, volumes, and container registry.
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes EU managed Kubernetes from OVH at low cost | DigitalOcean Kubernetes Managed Kubernetes from $12/month | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $12/mo |
| Best for | EU-focused teams that want managed Kubernetes economics without control-plane fees and are comfortable driving clusters through Terraform and kubectl. | Startups and small teams deploying managed Kubernetes for the first time who want a free control plane and Droplet-priced nodes without hyperscaler pricing or complexity. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionhourly billingeu datacentergdpr compliantapi access | managed optionhourly billingeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessterraform provider |
| Visit OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes → | Visit DigitalOcean Kubernetes → | |
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
Pros
- + Permanently free managed control plane on the Free plan (up to 100 nodes)
- + Standard plan adds dedicated multi-AZ control plane for $0.099/hour per cluster
- + Official Terraform/Pulumi support, autoscaling, OIDC, vRack private networking
- + EU data residency with regions in France, Germany, UK and Poland
- + $200 Public Cloud trial credit covers roughly a month of real worker nodes
Cons
- - Free plan SLA is 99.5% with no service credits; Standard 99.99% promised only after beta
- - Control panel is dense and less polished than GKE or DigitalOcean
- - Ticket-based support on standard tiers; no multi-cluster management in-product
- - etcd quota (400 MiB free / 8 GiB standard) limits CRD-heavy operator usage
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Pros
- + No cluster management fee — free control plane, pay only for worker nodes
- + Worker nodes billed per second from $12/month with a 672-hour monthly cap
- + CNCF-certified Kubernetes with automatic patch upgrades and close upstream version tracking
- + Integrated load balancers, block storage, firewalls, and container registry with one API and CLI
- + Free built-in cluster monitoring with Slack/email alerts
- + Node pools span Basic to GPU (H100) Droplets, including isolated nodes with no public IP
Cons
- - Realistic production clusters cost $60-90/month once nodes, the $12/month load balancer, and storage are counted
- - Autoscaling is less sophisticated than EKS/GKE; no serverless pods or node auto-provisioning
- - No Windows or bare-metal worker nodes
- - Version support windows follow upstream strictly — clusters must keep upgrading
- - Standard support is ticket-based with no Kubernetes-specific enterprise tier
- - HA control plane status versus the 99.95% SLA is ambiguous across official pages
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.