Nodecraft vs Zap Hosting
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nodecraft and Zap Hosting.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Nodecraft
0 reviews
3.5/5
Zap Hosting
0 reviews
Nodecraft is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.5). Nodecraft uses their proprietary NodePanel for managing game servers. Supports Minecraft, Rust, ARK, and other popular games. Switchable servers — change games without losing data. German game server and application hosting with instant deployment.
Nodecraft Game server hosting with NodePanel control | Zap Hosting Game & application server hosting | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $5.96/mo | From $2.76/mo✓ |
| Best for | Friend groups and community admins who want a genuinely usable control panel, multi-game flexibility on one server slot, and a choice of 28+ regions — especially mixed global player bases and non-technical server owners. | European gaming communities (Minecraft, FiveM, Rust) wanting one-click servers, game-grade DDoS filtering and one panel for game, voice and web services |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 50 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 8 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €1.38 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Eygelshoven NL; London UK; Ashburn/Dallas/Los Angeles US; Beauharnois CA; Singapore; Sydney AU |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionus datacenter | — |
| Visit Nodecraft → | ||
Nodecraft
Pros
- + NodePanel is the best control panel in the game-hosting segment: dual-pane files, live console, form-based config, mobile apps
- + Game swapping across ~59 titles on the same server slot, with saved instances, at no extra cost
- + 28+ datacenter regions on five continents with a public per-game latency checker
- + Transparent published price ladder per RAM size with discounts for longer terms and a no-card 24-hour trial
- + Cloud backups included at no extra fee; automatic on Lite and Pro
- + AMD Ryzen 9/EPYC hardware with an explicit no-overselling policy and DDoS packet scrubbing
Cons
- - Support is business-hours US Central, not 24/7 — weak for weekend-evening incidents
- - Lite servers hibernate when unused; 24/7 reachability requires the Pro line
- - Premium pricing versus budget hosts like Shockbyte at most RAM tiers
- - No published contractual uptime SLA (the 99.9% figure is marketing phrasing)
- - Datacenter relocation is a ticket request rather than self-service
- - Smaller game catalog than Nitrado; no studio-partnered console exclusives
Zap Hosting
Pros
- + Own hardware, own network and RIPE IP ranges across 8 locations on 4 continents — including Sydney
- + Game-aware DDoS protection (PletX, up to 4 Tbit/s filtering) included, live-tested on Twitch at 1.2 Tbit/s
- + 100+ game titles with one-click installers, mod packs and free game switching; panel included with VPS/dedicated
- + Lifetime (pay-once) plans alongside monthly; VPS line from about €2.99/month is genuinely competitive
- + 24/7 support across three channels with fast response in community feedback
Cons
- - Per-slot pricing inflates quickly: 4 GB costs €22.63/30 days at 40 slots vs €2.76 for 2 GB at 4 slots
- - Contradictory hardware claims across pages (Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs dual EPYC 7763) and older US hardware (Dell R720/HP C7000)
- - No published uptime SLA, refund policy or backup retention; billing/cancellation complaints in community feedback
- - Location surcharges up to +56% and currency display switching make true cost comparison hard
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.