Nodecraft vs Psychz Networks
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nodecraft and Psychz Networks.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Nodecraft
0 reviews
3.6/5
Psychz Networks
0 reviews
Nodecraft is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). Nodecraft uses their proprietary NodePanel for managing game servers. Supports Minecraft, Rust, ARK, and other popular games. Switchable servers — change games without losing data. 16 cities (US: Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta; EU: Amsterdam, London, Barcelona; plus Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg); DDoS mitigation packages up to 500 Gbps with 2-20 Gbps bundled free per dedicated server
Nodecraft Game server hosting with NodePanel control | Psychz Networks DDoS-protected bare metal, VPS, and colocation in 16 cities across the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $5.96/mo | From $4/mo✓ |
| Best for | Friend groups and community admins who want a genuinely usable control panel, multi-game flexibility on one server slot, and a choice of 28+ regions — especially mixed global player bases and non-technical server owners. | Gaming, streaming, and media operators needing DDoS-heavy infrastructure or unusual reach (South America, Africa, South Asia), and anyone who wants a fully priced catalogue with hourly testing before committing. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Storage | — | 50 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 16 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €2.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €1.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, Amsterdam, London, Barcelona, Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionus datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available |
| Visit Nodecraft → | Visit Psychz Networks → | |
Nodecraft
Pros
- + NodePanel is the best control panel in the game-hosting segment: dual-pane files, live console, form-based config, mobile apps
- + Game swapping across ~59 titles on the same server slot, with saved instances, at no extra cost
- + 28+ datacenter regions on five continents with a public per-game latency checker
- + Transparent published price ladder per RAM size with discounts for longer terms and a no-card 24-hour trial
- + Cloud backups included at no extra fee; automatic on Lite and Pro
- + AMD Ryzen 9/EPYC hardware with an explicit no-overselling policy and DDoS packet scrubbing
Cons
- - Support is business-hours US Central, not 24/7 — weak for weekend-evening incidents
- - Lite servers hibernate when unused; 24/7 reachability requires the Pro line
- - Premium pricing versus budget hosts like Shockbyte at most RAM tiers
- - No published contractual uptime SLA (the 99.9% figure is marketing phrasing)
- - Datacenter relocation is a ticket request rather than self-service
- - Smaller game catalog than Nitrado; no studio-partnered console exclusives
Psychz Networks
Pros
- + Sixteen cities on four continents — Johannesburg, Sao Paulo, Mumbai, and Moscow on one account, which almost no competitor offers
- + DDoS mitigation is a core competency: bundled filtering on every dedicated server, tiers to 500 Gbps, fourteen scrubbing points, and remote protection via reverse proxy without needing an ASN
- + Public catalogue of 158 priced plans — no quote-form gate; VMs from $4/month and hourly from $0.0011
- + S3-compatible object storage with zero egress charges and immutable object lock included
- + Service commitment with real teeth: 99.9% network uptime and 5% credit per half hour of outage up to a full month's fee
- + Own facilities and network since 2014 (hosting since 2001) — an operating company, not a reseller shell
Cons
- - All payments non-refundable (continuous backup excepted); claims expire after one calendar year; Texas law with California arbitration
- - Usage policy reserves a discretionary takedown right over otherwise legal content; adult-content permission is a 2015 forum answer, not policy
- - Support and provisioning reviews are genuinely mixed despite the 15-minute response promise
- - Bandwidth is 'unmetered' under an unpublished fair-use threshold
- - EU footprint thinner than US/Asia; documentation and control panel are functional rather than polished
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.