Nginx vs Hetzner Load Balancer
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nginx and Hetzner Load Balancer.
Quick Verdict
4.2/5
Nginx
0 reviews
3.9/5
Hetzner Load Balancer
0 reviews
Nginx is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). Used by 30.2% of all websites whose web server is known (W3Techs, Oct 2026), second behind Cloudflare Server at 32.6%; still the most widely deployed self-hosted web server and reverse proxy. Hetzner's managed load balancer distributes TCP and HTTP(S) traffic across Hetzner Cloud and dedicated root server targets, with configurable health checks, SSL termination and sticky sessions. From €7.49/month, hourly billed.
Nginx Open source web server and load balancer | Hetzner Load Balancer Managed load balancing with Layer 4/7 support and auto-scaling integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From $7.49/mo |
| Best for | Every team running web applications that wants the industry-standard free reverse proxy and HTTP load balancer, with a paid Plus path when active health checks and support become necessary. | Teams already running Hetzner Cloud or Hetzner dedicated servers who need a cheap, managed, well-documented entry point with TLS termination and health checks. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | 20 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 99.95% | — |
| Data-center count | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Falkenstein (DE)Nuremberg (DE)Helsinki (FI)Ashburn, VA (US)Hillsboro, OR (US)Singapore (SG) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | managed optioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Nginx → | Visit Hetzner Load Balancer → | |
Nginx
Pros
- + Free, BSD-licensed, and battle-tested across two decades of production use
- + Web server, reverse proxy, cache, and HTTP/TCP/UDP load balancer in one binary
- + 10,000+ concurrent connections at very low memory footprint
- + Modern protocol coverage: HTTP/2, gRPC, WebSockets, IPv6, ACME, experimental HTTP/3
- + Zero-downtime binary and configuration reloads
- + Enormous documentation and community knowledge base; every ops engineer knows it
Cons
- - Configuration file learning curve is steep and error feedback is terse
- - Active health checks, runtime config API, and fleet metrics are locked behind NGINX Plus
- - No SLA or vendor support for self-managed open-source installs
- - Project stewardship friction (freenginx and Angie forks) after F5 acquisition
- - HTTP/3 remains experimental in the open-source branch
Hetzner Load Balancer
Pros
- + Cheap for a managed load balancer: LB11 at €7.49/month with 20 TB EU included traffic and a Primary IPv4 included
- + Targets both Hetzner Cloud servers and dedicated root servers over public or private IPv4
- + Solid HTTP feature set: TLS termination with managed certificates, sticky sessions, HTTP-to-HTTPS redirect, proxy protocol
- + Per-service health checks (HTTP/HTTPS/TCP) with configurable interval, timeout, retries and expected responses
- + Hourly billing with monthly cap, six locations across four network zones, first-class API/Terraform/Kubernetes integration
Cons
- - Only Round Robin and Least Connections — no IP-hash, weighting, or L7 path-based routing rules
- - No request logging at all; no WAF or bot management; no built-in autoscaling
- - HTTPS services forward plain HTTP to targets; end-to-end TLS requires a TCP service and loses HTTP features
- - Hetzner targets only (no multi-cloud or on-prem backends); load balancers are bound to a single location
- - No product-level SLA or credits and no published throughput figures per plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.