Nexusguard vs Sucuri
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nexusguard and Sucuri.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Nexusguard
0 reviews
3.7/5
Sucuri
0 reviews
Sucuri is rated higher (3.7 vs 3.6). Nexusguard provides cloud-based DDoS mitigation and Web Application Firewall (WAF) services. Built for enterprises handling high-volume traffic who need automated threat detection and rapid attack response. GoDaddy-owned website security platform (founded 2010): cloud WAF, Anycast CDN, DDoS mitigation, and unlimited human malware cleanups. Firewall-only plans from $9.99/mo; security platform plans from $229/yr. Popular with WordPress sites and small businesses.
Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications | Sucuri Website firewall and malware cleanup service | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 3.7 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | From $9.99/mo |
| Best for | Communications service providers, ISPs, and APAC-heavy enterprises that want carrier-grade, flat-rate managed DDoS mitigation with white-label resale options. | WordPress and small-business site owners who want a cloud firewall plus guaranteed professional malware cleanup from one vendor, and value recovery speed enough to pay for a faster SLA tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protection | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Nexusguard → | Visit Sucuri → | |
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Flat-rate pricing that does not penalize customers during attacks
- + True Hybrid architecture: on-site Bastions appliances plus global cloud scrubbing with automatic spill-over
- + Eighteen-year track record inside 100+ CSPs protecting 50,000+ ASNs
- + DNS Protection with a guaranteed 100% availability SLA
- + Geolocation-aware scrubbing routing with automatic health-check failover
- + White-label DDoS-protection-as-a-service program for carriers and MSSPs
Cons
- - No public pricing, no free tier, no self-service onboarding — quote-only sales engagement
- - Deployment requires DNS rerouting, BGP, or GRE tunnels: real setup complexity
- - CSP-first product roadmap; enterprises are often served through resellers
- - WAF is a layered add-on, not a standalone application-security platform
- - Scrubbing-center count is inconsistent across the vendor's own pages (40+ vs 50+)
Sucuri
Pros
- + Unlimited manual malware cleanups by real analysts on every platform plan
- + WAF, DDoS mitigation (layers 3/4/7), and CDN in one proxy — one DNS change to activate
- + Clear, published plan economics: SLA times and scan frequencies per tier
- + Virtual patching covers unpatched CMS installs while you update
- + 24/7/365 ticket support and a 30-day money-back guarantee
Cons
- - Best feature (human cleanup) engages after you are already breached
- - Response SLAs are tier-gated: 30-hour estimate on the entry plan, and it is not an uptime SLA
- - CDN performance is a convenience layer, not a match for dedicated CDN networks
- - No free tier; firewall-only plans exclude the cleanup service
- - GoDaddy ownership adds portfolio-strategy questions for a trust-critical purchase
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.