Nexusguard vs StackPath
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nexusguard and StackPath.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Nexusguard
0 reviews
1.0/5
StackPath
0 reviews
Nexusguard is rated higher (3.6 vs 1.0). Nexusguard provides cloud-based DDoS mitigation and Web Application Firewall (WAF) services. Built for enterprises handling high-volume traffic who need automated threat detection and rapid attack response. Defunct edge platform. StackPath closed all products and began liquidating assets in June 2024; its CDN line had already ceased in November 2023. Not purchasable.
Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications | StackPath Defunct edge platform (closed 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ | 1.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | discontinued |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Communications service providers, ISPs, and APAC-heavy enterprises that want carrier-grade, flat-rate managed DDoS mitigation with white-label resale options. | Nobody in 2026 — StackPath was dissolved in June 2024. For the same CDN + WAF + DDoS + edge compute combination, look at Cloudflare, Fastly, or Akamai. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protection | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Nexusguard → | Visit StackPath → | |
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Flat-rate pricing that does not penalize customers during attacks
- + True Hybrid architecture: on-site Bastions appliances plus global cloud scrubbing with automatic spill-over
- + Eighteen-year track record inside 100+ CSPs protecting 50,000+ ASNs
- + DNS Protection with a guaranteed 100% availability SLA
- + Geolocation-aware scrubbing routing with automatic health-check failover
- + White-label DDoS-protection-as-a-service program for carriers and MSSPs
Cons
- - No public pricing, no free tier, no self-service onboarding — quote-only sales engagement
- - Deployment requires DNS rerouting, BGP, or GRE tunnels: real setup complexity
- - CSP-first product roadmap; enterprises are often served through resellers
- - WAF is a layered add-on, not a standalone application-security platform
- - Scrubbing-center count is inconsistent across the vendor's own pages (40+ vs 50+)
StackPath
Pros
- + Historically bundled CDN, WAF, DDoS, and edge compute under one account
- + Large final footprint (73 edge locations across 43 metro markets, company's own count)
- + Edge compute with VMs and containers in the same PoPs as content delivery
- + Backing from Juniper, Cox, and ABRY gave it enterprise credibility while it lasted
Cons
- - Company defunct since June 2024 — all products closed, assets liquidated, support switched off
- - CDN business sold to Akamai in 2023; customers stranded through three platform migrations in five years
- - Conflicting PoP counts across its own marketing pages (45 / 50+ / 73)
- - Any pricing or feature list found online is historical, not purchasable
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.