Nexusguard vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nexusguard and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Nexusguard
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.6). Nexusguard provides cloud-based DDoS mitigation and Web Application Firewall (WAF) services. Built for enterprises handling high-volume traffic who need automated threat detection and rapid attack response. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Communications service providers, ISPs, and APAC-heavy enterprises that want carrier-grade, flat-rate managed DDoS mitigation with white-label resale options. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protection | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Nexusguard → | Visit Gcore → | |
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Flat-rate pricing that does not penalize customers during attacks
- + True Hybrid architecture: on-site Bastions appliances plus global cloud scrubbing with automatic spill-over
- + Eighteen-year track record inside 100+ CSPs protecting 50,000+ ASNs
- + DNS Protection with a guaranteed 100% availability SLA
- + Geolocation-aware scrubbing routing with automatic health-check failover
- + White-label DDoS-protection-as-a-service program for carriers and MSSPs
Cons
- - No public pricing, no free tier, no self-service onboarding — quote-only sales engagement
- - Deployment requires DNS rerouting, BGP, or GRE tunnels: real setup complexity
- - CSP-first product roadmap; enterprises are often served through resellers
- - WAF is a layered add-on, not a standalone application-security platform
- - Scrubbing-center count is inconsistent across the vendor's own pages (40+ vs 50+)
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.